Skip to main content

Agentic BI Reporting Services

Board-ready answers that show their work

Ask in the chat app your team already uses: Slack, Teams, Google Chat, WhatsApp, Telegram or your own. Six AI agents turn the question into SQL on your governed metrics, check it before it runs and reply with the chart, the answer and its sources.

#reportingAnswered

You asked in #reporting

When is South Australia's power cheapest?

BI agent replied in #reporting

Checked

Between 12:00 and 16:00. SA1 averaged −5 dollars per MWh in that block, the only below-zero average in the table, and 11 of the 24 negative-price intervals in the window landed in SA1.

Rests on

  1. DefinitionMetric: spot price (RRP)
  2. SQLMean RRP by region and 4-hour block
  3. ChecksNegative prices kept, not clamped
  4. AnswerSA1, 12:00 to 16:00

Agents6 of 6

  1. Planner, doneReads the question
  2. SQL generator, doneWrites SQL from the governed metric
  3. Validator, doneChecks it before it runs
  4. Executor, doneRuns it on the warehouse
  5. Visualizer, donePicks the chart
  6. Narrator, doneWrites the answer

Replay a real question

Scripted run, real data7 dashboards built from delivered data247 checks recomputed from source files

150+ projects delivered for teams in 15+ countries

  • White Ribbon Alliance logo
  • OBJX Intelligence logo
  • alice/ai logo
  • YouHeal logo
  • Athenahealth logo
  • Supply Bridge logo
  • Setmore logo
  • Clear Gene logo

The dashboard behind this answer, and six more

Built for this portfolio from seven client projects' delivered data; open any card to see the whole dashboard.

  • Recruiting

    Cybersecurity job market: Dice.com listings

    500 listings × 23 fields

    What the data says

    • The salary field needs parsing, not reading.
    • Remote is the default, not the exception.

    What to decideAdvertise cyber roles as remote or hybrid by default.

    6 charts · 4 KPIs

  • Academic research

    SSRN research corpus: attention and authorship

    239,037 papers × 43 fields

    What the data says

    • Downloads are top-heavy: the most downloaded 10% of papers take 65% of them.
    • Views predict downloads well enough to substitute for them: R² = 0.64.

    What to decidePut the promotion budget behind the top 10% of papers.

    7 charts · 4 KPIs

  • Social and brand

    LinkedIn company pages: engagement analysis

    15,192 posts × 14 fields

    What the data says

    • Engagement is far more concentrated than posting volume.
    • The top 1% of posts carry 25% of total likes.

    What to decideJudge company pages on engagement per post, not post count.

    7 charts · 4 KPIs

  • ESG research

    LinkedIn employee advocacy: ESG signal extraction

    1,395,138 posts × 20 fields

    What the data says

    • Volume peaked in 2021 and has since turned down.
    • The scorer is deliberately conservative.

    What to decideTreat the ESG score as a floor, not the full picture.

    5 charts · 4 KPIs

  • E-commerce

    B2B product catalogue: coverage and data quality

    72,685 SKUs × 14 fields

    What the data says

    • Ten brands are 71% of the catalogue; the tail is 309 deep.
    • Media coverage is the catalogue's weakest field, not the scraper's.

    What to decideNegotiate and merchandise around the ten brands that make 71% of the range.

    4 charts · 4 KPIs

  • Social intelligence

    Twitter/X: follower harvesting and concentration

    39,168 profiles × 3 fields

    What the data says

    • Gini coefficient 0.993: about as unequal as a distribution gets.
    • Only 51% of profiles resolved.

    What to decidePlan campaign reach on the median account, not the mean.

    6 charts · 4 KPIs

Decisions for every leader, from one set of governed numbers

Each leader asks in the chat app they already use, in their own words. The agents answer from the same governed metrics, with the evidence, the decision it supports and the number to watch.

CEO

Company performance

  1. Asks in WhatsApp

    Which regions are behind plan this quarter, and why?

  2. What comes back

    • Revenue and margin by region against plan
    • The drivers behind each gap
    • Sources and checks for every number
  3. The decision it supports

    Where to move budget and attention next quarter

  4. What to watch

    Plan attainment by region, every week

CFO

Finance

  1. Asks in Microsoft Teams

    Why did gross margin fall last month, and which product lines drove it?

  2. What comes back

    • Margin by product line against the month before
    • Price, mix and cost effects, separated
    • The checks behind every figure
  3. The decision it supports

    Which lines to reprice, renegotiate or cut

  4. What to watch

    Gross margin by product line

COO

Operations

  1. Asks in Google Chat

    Where are orders getting stuck, and what is the delay costing us?

  2. What comes back

    • Cycle time by step and by site
    • The steps where delays pile up
    • The cost of the delay, from your own data
  3. The decision it supports

    Where to add capacity or change the process

  4. What to watch

    Cycle time at the slowest step

CRO

Revenue

  1. Asks in Slack

    Which deals are likely to slip this quarter, and what do they share?

  2. What comes back

    • Pipeline by stage and by age
    • Open deals with the traits of past slips
    • Win rate by segment
  3. The decision it supports

    Where the sales team spends this week

  4. What to watch

    Pipeline coverage against target

CMO

Marketing

  1. Asks in Telegram

    Which channels bring customers who stay, not just leads?

  2. What comes back

    • Cost per retained customer, by channel
    • Retention by first channel
    • Spend against return, month by month
  3. The decision it supports

    Where to move next month's budget

  4. What to watch

    Cost per retained customer

CHRO

People

  1. Asks in Mattermost

    Which teams are losing people, and how early can we see it coming?

  2. What comes back

    • Attrition by team and by tenure
    • The signals that came before past departures
    • Time to hire against plan
  3. The decision it supports

    Where to act first on retention and hiring

  4. What to watch

    Regretted attrition by team

Asked in the chat your company already uses

Team chat

  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Google Chat
  • Mattermost
  • Webex
  • Zoom Team Chat
  • Rocket.Chat
  • Discord

Messaging apps

  • WhatsApp Business
  • Telegram
  • Zalo
  • LINE
  • Viber

Work suites in Asia

  • Lark
  • DingTalk
  • WeCom

Your own

  • In-house chat
  • Web portal
  • Email
  • API and webhooks

Every channel asks the same agents and reads the same governed metrics. An in-house chat or portal connects through an API and webhooks.

Each leader sees only what their role allows: the agents query through least-privilege roles, check every query before it runs and send regulated metrics to a human reviewer.

A delivery plan sized to your data, with a gate at every step

The audit turns your sources, metrics and questions into a dated plan and a fixed quote. The order never changes: no phase starts until the one before it passes its gate.

Size the plan to your data

Data sources

How many systems feed the answers, and how clean and documented they are.

Metric definitions

Already in a semantic layer such as dbt or LookML, or still to agree with their owners.

First-release scope

How many questions, teams and channels the first release covers.

Reviews and sign-off

How quickly security review runs and metric owners can sign off.

Change an answer to see which phases it stretches.

Illustrative, not a quote: the audit dates your real plan.

Your plan≈ 5 weeksto go-live

  1. Next domain: audit, build and pilot again

01

Free consultation

30 minutes, free

What you get

  • A first read of your warehouse and reporting workflow
  • The recurring questions worth handing to agents first
  • What would hold it back: data, access or metric gaps

Gate: Go or no-go

You know whether agentic BI fits your reporting, and what the audit has to cover.

02

Data and metric audit

Set by your sources

What you get

  • Data readiness report: freshness, quality and access per source
  • Metric inventory and gap report
  • An eval suite of 80 to 150 of your real questions, with expected answers
  • Architecture, running-cost estimate, dated plan and fixed quote

Gate: Plan signed

Sources, the accuracy mark, the dates and the quote are agreed in writing before any build starts.

03

Build on your data

Set by sources and metrics

What you get

  • MCP server with least-privilege roles
  • Six agents and the SQL validator
  • The eval suite run on every change
  • Answers in your chat apps, with a progress report every week

Gate: Eval passed

Your eval suite clears the agreed accuracy mark, and every write or out-of-scope query is blocked.

04

Shadow run and pilot

Set by scope and reviews

What you get

  • Answers checked beside your analysts' before anyone relies on them
  • A pilot group asking in your chat apps
  • Every miss added to the eval suite
  • Security review and access sign-off

Gate: Pilot signed off

Your analysts and metric owners accept the pilot's answers, and security signs off on access.

05

Launch and run

30 days, then monthly

What you get

  • Runbooks and prompt versioning
  • 30 days of tuning after launch
  • Accuracy and cost monitoring, with a monthly eval report
  • An optional fixed monthly scope

Gate: Handover

Your team runs it from the runbooks, or we keep evals, prompts and the semantic layer current on a fixed monthly scope.

FROM DELIVERED PROJECTS

Tech stack: the tools behind every layer

150 technologies across 10 layers, every one of them used in delivered BI, analytics and data work.

Pick a layer, or let the orbit walk you through them.

Agents & Models

9 tools

Text to SQL, extraction and narration, with the right model for each step.

  • LangGraph
  • LangChain
  • Claude
  • OpenAI GPT-4o
  • Google Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Mistral
  • WebLLM
  • MCP

On the orbitLangGraph · Claude · OpenAI GPT-4o · Google Gemini · MCP

In our clients' words: reviews from Upwork

Verified Upwork reviews of our data, automation and agent work.

Verified on Upwork

5.0

71 client reviews · 69 of them five-star

  • 5 stars69
  • 4 stars2
  • 3 stars0
  • 2 stars0
  • 1 star0
See Upwork Reviews
CK

Chris K.

December 30, 2025

“Great backend developer, highly recommend!”

FT Platform Phase #2

Verified Upwork review

GB

Gilad B.

December 18, 2025

“Very knowledgeable and professional. Good communication”

Phase 0: Design a granular data schema and structure, and full tool flow

Verified Upwork review

JD

Julio D.

July 16, 2025

“Tran was great, very knowledgeable and quick responses”

Web scraper in R

Verified Upwork review

MM

Madison M.

March 31, 2025

“Very responsive and quick to get started! Produced excellent results. I will definitely reach out again in the future.”

Review Git Pull Requests

Verified Upwork review

DC

David C.

March 29, 2025

“Great platform to interface with developer.”

You will get AWS, GCP and Azure Data pipeline

Verified Upwork review

AJ

Alex J.

February 18, 2025

“Fast, responsive, professional. Really appreciated the thorough documentation too.”

You will get Data Scraping | Data Extraction | Web Scraper | Automation Tools

Verified Upwork review

TS

Tomer S.

December 12, 2024

“Van exceeded all expectations with exceptional professionalism and expertise. They delivered high-quality work ahead of schedule, communicated effectively throughout the project, and made the collaboration seamless and enjoyable. I highly recommend Van to anyone looking for a skilled and reliable freelancer.”

Create Web scraper for Facebook

Verified Upwork review

PT

Preska T.

October 21, 2024

“I recently had the pleasure of working with Tran, and I can't express enough how impressed I am with his work. From the very beginning, he demonstrated a deep understanding of our project requirements and brought a level of expertise that made a significant difference in the outcome. What truly sets Tran apart is his commitment to excellence.”

You will get Data Scraping | Data Extraction | Web Scraper | Automation Tools

Verified Upwork review

AW

Alice W.

May 26, 2024

“AMAZING. We are lucky that we found Van. He helped us with our database structure. He is very knowledgeable and very cooperative. We are still continuing to work with him further. I can only highly recommend.”

Admin Panel for Data Management

Verified Upwork review

NS

Nic S.

May 15, 2024

“Excellent work. I'd be very happy to work with Tran in the future.”

Web scraping: Project review and proposal

Verified Upwork review

PK

Paris K.

March 22, 2024

“Tran did a great job on a LAMP REST API deployment to Microsoft Azure. We'd be happy to work with this freelancer again.”

Seeking developers experienced with LAMP (Python) and REST APIs for UX Research Study / gstd-2024-1

Verified Upwork review

YK

Yalcin K.

March 18, 2024

“Van is a great data engineer, and I highly recommend it. He joined our project and helped build a custom data pipeline within weeks.”

Python Developer to Build a Shopify Integration

Verified Upwork review

Agentic BI questions CEOs and business owners ask

Bring one report your team rebuilds every week

Book a free 30-minute call with the founder. Bring the report, your warehouse setup and the questions it has to answer. You leave with a go or no-go, and a fixed quote follows once the scope is clear.

We use these details only to reply about your project. See our privacy policy.

Tran Tien Van, Founder of Van Data Team, ready to help

Keep exploring

Services teams often pair with this one, delivered by the same founder-led team.

See all 6 services