text model comparison
GPT-6 Cyber vs GPT-Rosalind-6
GPT-6 Cyber and GPT-Rosalind-6 are both current text models, from OpenAI. GPT-Rosalind-6 is 25% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-6 Cyber, $15 vs $20.
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- GPT-Rosalind-6$15 against $20
- Newer release
- GPT-6 CyberNov 2026 against Oct 2026
Data verified November 6, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-06
Side by side
GPT-6 Cyber and GPT-Rosalind-6, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | GPT-6 Cyber | GPT-Rosalind-6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $20 | $15 (better) |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $100 | $75 (better) |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Release date | November 5, 2026 | October 30, 2026 |
| Access | limited access | limited access |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | Not reported |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | Not reported |
| Input | text, image | text |
| Output | text | text |
Charts
Against every current text model
Where GPT-6 Cyber and GPT-Rosalind-6 land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
No independent benchmark has scored either model yet, so the tiles rank their prices among the current models of their task.
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
GPT-6 Cyber:#58of 58
$20 · cheaper than 0%
GPT-Rosalind-6:#57of 58
$15 · cheaper than 2%
Price per 1M output tokens
GPT-6 Cyber:#58of 58
$100 · cheaper than 0%
GPT-Rosalind-6:#56of 58
$75 · cheaper than 2%
Context window
GPT-6 Cyber:#1of 67
1.05M tokens · longer than 85%
GPT-Rosalind-6: Not listed
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Cyber costs 1.3 times as much as GPT-Rosalind-6, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
GPT-6 Cyber costs 1.3× as much
- GPT-6 Cyber
- $400
- GPT-Rosalind-6
- $300
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
GPT-6 Cyber costs 1.3× as much
- GPT-6 Cyber
- $238
- GPT-Rosalind-6
- $178.50
| Workload or rate | GPT-6 Cyber | GPT-Rosalind-6 |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $400 | $300 (better) |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $238 | $178.50 (better) |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $2 | $1.50 (better) |
Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.
Launch price $100, regular price $150
Verdict
When to choose each
GPT-6 Cyber
Where it leads
- Accepts image input
Best for
- Security teams approved for Daybreak Red that develop and validate exploits in authorized tests
- Vulnerability research and patch validation across large codebases such as browsers and kernels
Watch out for
- Limited access: OpenAI is rolling it out through the API and Codex to select approved Daybreak Red customers first, with identity verification, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication and API IP allowlisting
- OpenAI rates it Critical in cybersecurity under its Preparedness Framework, like GPT-6 Astra and up from High for GPT-5.6 Cyber, and adds checks that block high-risk activity against critical systems
- It does not beat GPT-6 Astra at general coding (82.95% against 83.24% on OpenAI's internal ExpertSWE), and on Irregular's FrontierCyber it solved 90 of 288 challenges against 96 for Astra; no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet
GPT-Rosalind-6
Where it leads
- Lower input and output prices, $15 and $75 vs $20 and $100 per 1M tokens
- Cheaper cached input, $1.50 vs $2 per 1M tokens
Best for
- Drug discovery and life sciences research teams approved for OpenAI's trusted access
- Dual-use biology research that GPT-6 Astra is more likely to refuse
Watch out for
- Limited access: OpenAI offers it only through its trusted-access program, after reviewing each applicant's intended use, security controls and governance, for internal research
- OpenAI treats it as High capability in the biological and chemical domain, so access comes with security, monitoring and enforcement terms
- OpenAI publishes no context window for it and compares it only with GPT-Rosalind-5.5; no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet
From benchmark to production
Building on GPT-6 Cyber or GPT-Rosalind-6?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes
FAQ
GPT-6 Cyber vs GPT-Rosalind-6 FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Cyber or GPT-Rosalind-6?
GPT-Rosalind-6 is 25% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-6 Cyber, $15 vs $20. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Cyber costs $400 and GPT-Rosalind-6 $300 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, GPT-6 Cyber or GPT-Rosalind-6?
GPT-6 Cyber charges $2 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and GPT-Rosalind-6 $1.50, 90% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Cyber costs $238 and GPT-Rosalind-6 $178.50.
How do GPT-6 Cyber and GPT-Rosalind-6 differ in features?
GPT-6 Cyber takes text and image input; GPT-Rosalind-6 takes text.
Further reading
More on GPT-6 Cyber and GPT-Rosalind-6
Articles on GPT-6 Cyber and GPT-Rosalind-6
- GPT-Rosalind-6: OpenAI's Biology Model and Trusted AccessNovember 1, 2026
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Cyber
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Rosalind-6
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Cyber
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-Rosalind-6
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-6 Cyber
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs GPT-Rosalind-6
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6 Cyber
- GPT-5.5 vs GPT-Rosalind-6
- GPT-5.6 Cyber vs GPT-6 Cyber
- GPT-5.6 Cyber vs GPT-Rosalind-6
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Cyber
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-Rosalind-6
Production evaluation
Choosing between GPT-6 Cyber and GPT-Rosalind-6?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty