Skip to main content

audio model comparison

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 vs MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming are both current audio models, from xAI and Microsoft AI. Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 is 81% cheaper per audio minute than MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming, $0.001667 vs $0.009. On Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming, Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 scores 2.79 % WER and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming 2.51 % WER (Artificial Analysis, measured November 3, 2026).

Higher Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming
MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming2.51 % WER against 2.79 % WER
Lower price per audio minute
Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0$0.001667 against $0.009
Newer release
MAI-Transcribe-2-StreamingOct 2026 against Sep 2026

Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03

Share this

Side by side

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGrok Voice Transcribe 2.0MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming
Price
Price per audio minute$0.001667 (better)$0.009
Price per audio minute (streaming)$0.003333Not listed
Independent benchmarks
Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming2.79 % WER (#2 of 3)2.51 % WER (#1 of 3) (better)
Artificial Analysis AA-WER v22.29 % WER (#4 of 7)Not measured
Specs
ProviderxAIMicrosoft AI
Release dateSeptember 18, 2026October 1, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputaudioaudio
Outputtexttext

Scores:Artificial Analysis · 2026-11-03Artificial Analysis · 2026-11-03

Open both in the interactive comparison

Charts

Against every current audio model

Where Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

On Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming, Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 ranks #2 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming #1 of 3 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming among the current audio models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Artificial Analysis AA-WER v2

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0:#4of 7

2.29% WER · ahead of 50%

MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming: Not scored

Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0:#2of 3

2.79% WER · ahead of 50%

MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming:#1of 3

2.51% WER · ahead of 100%

Price and context

Price per audio minute

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0:#1of 14

$0.001667 · cheaper than 92%

MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming:#11of 14

$0.009 · cheaper than 15%

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

The same work, priced

For 100 hours of audio, MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming costs 5.4 times as much as Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0, at each provider's listed rates.

What Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming cost for the same work, at the rates each provider lists.
  • 100 hours of audio

    MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming costs 5.4× as much

    Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0
    $10
    MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming
    $54
Workload or rateGrok Voice Transcribe 2.0MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming
Example workloads
100 hours of audio$10 (better)$54
100 hours of audio (streaming)$20Not listed

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0

Where it leads

  • Lower price per audio minute, $0.001667 vs $0.009
  • Supports speaker diarization

Best for

  • Low-cost batch transcription
  • Streaming transcription for voice apps

Watch out for

  • xAI's per-model page leaves pricing blank; the rates come from its models table and launch post

MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming

Where it leads

  • Better Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming result, 2.51 % WER vs 2.79 % WER (lower is better)

Best for

  • Live captions and voice agents
  • Multilingual calls where speakers switch languages

Watch out for

  • Microsoft Foundry lists it as a preview
  • The $0.54 per hour price is introductory until the end of 2026, and the later price is not published

From benchmark to production

Building on Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 or MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

FAQ

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 vs MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 or MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming?

Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 is 81% cheaper per audio minute than MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming, $0.001667 vs $0.009.

How much would 100 hours of audio cost with Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 or MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming?

100 hours of audio comes to $10 with Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and $54 with MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming at their listed rates.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 or MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming?

MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming leads on Artificial Analysis AA-WER Streaming, 2.51 % WER to 2.79 % WER. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

How do Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming differ in features?

Only Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 supports speaker diarization.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Grok Voice Transcribe 2.0 and MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty