Skip to main content

text model comparison

Inkling 2 Small vs Solar Pro 4

Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4 are both current text models, from Thinking Machines Lab and Upstage. Both cost $0.30 per 1M input tokens. Solar Pro 4 has the larger context window, 512,000 vs 262,144 tokens.

Longer context window
Solar Pro 4512K tokens against 262K tokens
Newer release
Inkling 2 SmallNov 2026 against Aug 2026

Data verified November 6, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-06

Share this

Side by side

Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactInkling 2 SmallSolar Pro 4
Price
Price per 1M input tokens$0.30$0.30
Price per 1M output tokens$1 (better)$1.20
Independent benchmarks
Arena TextNot measured1388 Elo (#48 of 52)
Arena WebDevNot measured1370 Elo (#44 of 46)
Specs
ProviderThinking Machines LabUpstage
Release dateNovember 5, 2026August 6, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window262,144 tokens512,000 tokens
Max outputNot reported128,000 tokens
Inputtext, imagetext
Outputtexttext

No independent benchmark has scored both models yet. Each rank counts the current models scored on that benchmark.

Scores:Arena · 2026-11-03

Charts

Against every current text model

Where Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4 land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

Only Solar Pro 4 has a current Arena Text score: #48 of 52. Each bar is the share of current models it beats.

Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4 among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Text

Inkling 2 Small: Not scored

Solar Pro 4:#48of 52

1,388 Elo · ahead of 8%

Arena WebDev

Inkling 2 Small: Not scored

Solar Pro 4:#44of 46

1,370 Elo · ahead of 4%

Price and context

Price per 1M input tokens

Inkling 2 Small:#11of 58

$0.30 · cheaper than 75%

Solar Pro 4:#11of 58

$0.30 · cheaper than 75%

Price per 1M output tokens

Inkling 2 Small:#10of 58

$1 · cheaper than 84%

Solar Pro 4:#11of 58

$1.20 · cheaper than 77%

Context window

Inkling 2 Small:#57of 67

262K tokens · longer than 12%

Solar Pro 4:#52of 67

512K tokens · longer than 23%

Quality against price

Arena Text · measured October 28, 2026

Solar Pro 4 scores 1,388 at $0.525 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Text score against price for 44 text models, Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4 marked.1,2501,3001,3501,4001,4501,5001,550$0.30$1$3$10MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $3Median 1,476Blended price per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scaleArena Text (Elo)Solar Pro 4
Quality against price: the data
Arena Text score against price for 44 text models, Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4 marked.
ModelProviderBlended price per 1M tokensArena Text (Elo)
Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle$41,528
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle$41,520
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$81,509
Muse WonderMeta$81,507
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$201,504
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic$201,504
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$1.501,496
Muse Spark 1.3Meta$21,495
Claude Opus 5Anthropic$101,492
Kimi K3Moonshot Kimi$61,488
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$81,485
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle$31,483
GPT-5.5OpenAI$111,482
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic$101,482
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Qwen$31,482
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI$41,481
GLM-5.3Z.ai$2.151,481
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi MiMo$0.541,480
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$41,477
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai$0.241,477
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI$201,476
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek$0.521,476
GPT-5.4OpenAI$5.631,475
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle$1.131,473
Grok 4.20xAI$1.561,472
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.501,467
Grok 4.5xAI$31,465
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$1.981,465
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$41,462
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$41,458
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.851,456
Grok 4.6xAI$31,455
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.451,453
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi MiMo$0.181,448
Step 5 PreviewStepFun$1.431,448
Grok 4.3xAI$1.561,442
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.201,441
Grok 4.7xAI$31,441
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI$1.051,432
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic$0.201,425
GPT-4.1OpenAI$3.501,415
Solar Pro 4Upstage$0.521,388
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI$0.701,383
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI$0.181,322

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

The same work, priced

For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Solar Pro 4 costs 1.1 times as much as Inkling 2 Small, at each provider's listed rates.

What Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4 cost for the same work, at the rates each provider lists.
  • 10M input and 2M output tokens

    Solar Pro 4 costs 1.1× as much

    Inkling 2 Small
    $5
    Solar Pro 4
    $5.40
  • The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached

    Solar Pro 4 costs 1.3× as much

    Inkling 2 Small
    $2.57
    Solar Pro 4
    $3.24
Workload or rateInkling 2 SmallSolar Pro 4
Example workloads
10M input and 2M output tokens$5 (better)$5.40
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached$2.57 (better)$3.24
Other listed rates
1M input tokens, cached$0.03 (better)$0.06

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

Inkling 2 Small

Where it leads

  • Lower price per 1M output tokens, $1 vs $1.20
  • Accepts image input
  • Cheaper cached input, $0.03 vs $0.06 per 1M tokens

Best for

  • Agentic coding and office, finance and legal work at a low per-token price
  • Teams that want to post-train their own variant on Tinker

Watch out for

  • Closed weights for now: Thinking Machines says it will publish the full weights under Apache 2.0 the week after launch, once external safety testing ends; until then Tinker is the only way to use it
  • Tinker serves it with a 64K or 256K context, although the model card lists up to 1M tokens
  • In its lab's own table DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores higher on DeepSWE v1.1 (77.0% against 72.1%) and Claude Haiku 5.5 on Vibe Code Bench (90.4% against 81.6%); Thinking Machines also says it is less tuned for chat, and no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet

Solar Pro 4

Where it leads

  • Larger context window 512,000 vs 262,144 tokens

Best for

  • Korean and Japanese enterprise workloads
  • Multi-step agent work with tool calls

Watch out for

  • A closed model: Upstage does not disclose its parameter count
  • Several of its published benchmark figures are in-house evaluations

From benchmark to production

Building on Inkling 2 Small or Solar Pro 4?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

FAQ

Inkling 2 Small vs Solar Pro 4 FAQ

Which is cheaper, Inkling 2 Small or Solar Pro 4?

Both cost $0.30 per 1M input tokens. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Inkling 2 Small costs $5 and Solar Pro 4 $5.40 at standard rates.

Which is cheaper with prompt caching, Inkling 2 Small or Solar Pro 4?

Inkling 2 Small charges $0.03 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and Solar Pro 4 $0.06, 80% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, Inkling 2 Small costs $2.57 and Solar Pro 4 $3.24.

Which has the larger context window, Inkling 2 Small or Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 has the larger context window, 512,000 vs 262,144 tokens.

How do Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4 differ in features?

Inkling 2 Small takes text and image input; Solar Pro 4 takes text.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Inkling 2 Small and Solar Pro 4?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty