Skip to main content

audio model comparison

Eleven Flash v2.5 vs TTS-1

Eleven Flash v2.5 and TTS-1 are both current audio models, from ElevenLabs and OpenAI. TTS-1 is 63% cheaper per character than Eleven Flash v2.5, $0.000015 vs $0.00004. On Artificial Analysis Speech Arena, Eleven Flash v2.5 scores 1078 Elo and TTS-1 1090 Elo (Artificial Analysis, measured October 13, 2026).

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactEleven Flash v2.5TTS-1
Price per character$0.00004$0.000015 (better)
Artificial Analysis Speech Arena1078 Elo (#11 of 11)1090 Elo (#9 of 11) (better)
ProviderElevenLabsOpenAI
Release dateNot reportedNot reported
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtexttext
Outputaudioaudio

Scores:Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13

Open both in the interactive comparison

When to choose each

Eleven Flash v2.5

Best for

  • Low-latency multilingual speech

Watch out for

  • Built for latency rather than expressiveness; Eleven v4 Turbo now sells at the same $0.04 per 1,000 characters
Full Eleven Flash v2.5 profile

TTS-1

Best for

  • Low-latency text-to-speech

Watch out for

  • OpenAI no longer lists TTS-1 on its models overview, though its model page and $15 per 1M characters price remain
Full TTS-1 profile

Eleven Flash v2.5 vs TTS-1 FAQ

Which is cheaper, Eleven Flash v2.5 or TTS-1?

TTS-1 is 63% cheaper per character than Eleven Flash v2.5, $0.000015 vs $0.00004.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Eleven Flash v2.5 or TTS-1?

TTS-1 leads on Artificial Analysis Speech Arena, 1090 Elo to 1078 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Eleven Flash v2.5 and TTS-1?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty