Skip to main content

audio model comparison

Sonic 3.6 vs TTS-1

Sonic 3.6 and TTS-1 are both current audio models, from Cartesia and OpenAI. TTS-1 is 77% cheaper per character than Sonic 3.6, $0.000015 vs $0.000065. On Artificial Analysis Speech Arena, Sonic 3.6 scores 1286 Elo and TTS-1 1090 Elo (Artificial Analysis, measured October 13, 2026).

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactSonic 3.6TTS-1
Price per character$0.000065$0.000015 (better)
Artificial Analysis Speech Arena1286 Elo (#3 of 11) (better)1090 Elo (#9 of 11)
ProviderCartesiaOpenAI
Release dateAugust 27, 2026Not reported
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtexttext
Outputaudioaudio

Scores:Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13

Open both in the interactive comparison

When to choose each

Sonic 3.6

Best for

  • Multilingual speech for voice agents
  • Indian-language and Hinglish speech

Watch out for

  • Credit-based plans only (1 credit per character); the recorded rate is the Pro plan overage of $65 per 1M characters, falling to $38 on the Scale plan
  • Cartesia does not state latency figures for this version
Full Sonic 3.6 profile

TTS-1

Best for

  • Low-latency text-to-speech

Watch out for

  • OpenAI no longer lists TTS-1 on its models overview, though its model page and $15 per 1M characters price remain
Full TTS-1 profile

Sonic 3.6 vs TTS-1 FAQ

Which is cheaper, Sonic 3.6 or TTS-1?

TTS-1 is 77% cheaper per character than Sonic 3.6, $0.000015 vs $0.000065.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Sonic 3.6 or TTS-1?

Sonic 3.6 leads on Artificial Analysis Speech Arena, 1286 Elo to 1090 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Sonic 3.6 and TTS-1?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty