Skip to main content

image model comparison

FLUX1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

FLUX1.1 [pro] and GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst are both current image models, from Black Forest Labs and OpenAI. On Arena Text-to-Image, FLUX1.1 [pro] scores 1016 Elo and GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst 1425 Elo (Arena, measured October 7, 2026).

Data verified October 12, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-12

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactFLUX1.1 [pro]GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst
Price per image$0.04Not reported
Price per 1M input tokensNot reported$5
Arena Text-to-Image1016 Elo (#9 of 9)1425 Elo (#1 of 9) (better)
Arena Image EditNot measured1524 Elo (#1 of 8)
ProviderBlack Forest LabsOpenAI
Release dateNot reportedSeptember 8, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtexttext, image
Outputimageimage

Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12

Open both in the interactive comparison

When to choose each

FLUX1.1 [pro]

Best for

  • Hosted FLUX text-to-image generation

Watch out for

  • No exact compatible public benchmark snapshot is recorded
Full FLUX1.1 [pro] profile

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Best for

  • Hero imagery, detailed edits and text-heavy graphics where quality matters most

Watch out for

  • OpenAI publishes no per-image price, and its GPT Image 2 calculator does not estimate 2.5 token use, so cost per image has to be measured
  • No independent image-quality benchmark is recorded here
Full GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst profile

FLUX1.1 [pro] vs GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst FAQ

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, FLUX1.1 [pro] or GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst?

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst leads on Arena Text-to-Image, 1425 Elo to 1016 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Production evaluation

Choosing between FLUX1.1 [pro] and GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty