Skip to main content

image model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image vs GPT Image 2

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image and GPT Image 2 are both current image models, from Google and OpenAI. On Arena Text-to-Image, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image scores 1262 Elo and GPT Image 2 1383 Elo (Arena, measured October 7, 2026).

Data verified October 12, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-12

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGemini 3.1 Flash ImageGPT Image 2
Price per image$0.045Not reported
Arena Text-to-Image1262 Elo (#5 of 9)1383 Elo (#3 of 9) (better)
Arena Image Edit1387 Elo (#6 of 8)1462 Elo (#3 of 8) (better)
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Release dateMay 28, 2026Not reported
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image
Outputtext, imageimage

Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12

Open both in the interactive comparison

When to choose each

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image

Best for

  • Interleaved text and image generation

Watch out for

  • No exact compatible public benchmark snapshot is recorded
Full Gemini 3.1 Flash Image profile

GPT Image 2

Best for

  • API image generation and editing

Watch out for

  • No exact compatible public benchmark snapshot is recorded
Full GPT Image 2 profile

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image vs GPT Image 2 FAQ

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image or GPT Image 2?

GPT Image 2 leads on Arena Text-to-Image, 1383 Elo to 1262 Elo; GPT Image 2 leads on Arena Image Edit, 1462 Elo to 1387 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Flash Image and GPT Image 2?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty