Skip to main content

video model comparison

Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs grok-imagine-video

Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 and grok-imagine-video are both current video models, from Google and xAI. grok-imagine-video is 50% cheaper per video second than Gemini Omni Flash 1.1, $0.05 vs $0.10.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGemini Omni Flash 1.1grok-imagine-video
Price per video second$0.10$0.05 (better)
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (text to video)1114 Elo (#2 of 4)Not measured
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (image to video)1130 Elo (#1 of 3)Not measured
Arena Text-to-VideoNot measured1342 Elo (#2 of 3)
Arena Image-to-VideoNot measured1415 Elo (#1 of 2)
ProviderGooglexAI
Release dateAugust 27, 2026Not reported
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window1,048,576 tokensNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, image, videotext, image, video
Outputvideo, audiovideo

Scores:Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13Arena · 2026-10-12

When to choose each

Gemini Omni Flash 1.1

Best for

  • Short clips with sound that need conversational edits

Watch out for

  • Each clip is 3 to 10 seconds; extensions add 10 seconds at a time up to 40 seconds
  • Editing uploaded videos is not available in every region, and voice editing is not supported
Full Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 profile

grok-imagine-video

Best for

  • Grok Imagine video generation and editing

Watch out for

  • No exact compatible public benchmark snapshot is recorded
Full grok-imagine-video profile

Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 vs grok-imagine-video FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 or grok-imagine-video?

grok-imagine-video is 50% cheaper per video second than Gemini Omni Flash 1.1, $0.05 vs $0.10.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 and grok-imagine-video?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty