Skip to main content

video model comparison

grok-imagine-video vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5

grok-imagine-video and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 are both current video models, from xAI. grok-imagine-video is 38% cheaper per video second than Grok Imagine Video 1.5, $0.05 vs $0.08.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

Factgrok-imagine-videoGrok Imagine Video 1.5
Price per video second$0.05 (better)$0.08
Arena Text-to-Video1342 Elo (#2 of 3)Not measured
Arena Image-to-Video1415 Elo (#1 of 2)Not measured
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (text to video)Not measured1048 Elo (#3 of 4)
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (image to video)Not measured1065 Elo (#3 of 3)
ProviderxAIxAI
Release dateNot reportedNot reported
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, image, videotext, image
Outputvideovideo

Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13

When to choose each

grok-imagine-video

Best for

  • Grok Imagine video generation and editing

Watch out for

  • No exact compatible public benchmark snapshot is recorded
Full grok-imagine-video profile

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Best for

  • Short 1080p clips with sound

Watch out for

  • Editing and extending videos still use the older grok-imagine-video model
  • xAI lists one $0.080 per second price with no breakdown by resolution
  • xAI has not published a release date
Full Grok Imagine Video 1.5 profile

grok-imagine-video vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5 FAQ

Which is cheaper, grok-imagine-video or Grok Imagine Video 1.5?

grok-imagine-video is 38% cheaper per video second than Grok Imagine Video 1.5, $0.05 vs $0.08.

Production evaluation

Choosing between grok-imagine-video and Grok Imagine Video 1.5?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty