Skip to main content

video model comparison

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Veo 3.1 Preview

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview are both current video models, from xAI and Google. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 lists $0.08 and Veo 3.1 Preview $0.40 (720p or 1080p, with audio) per video second, at different tiers, so the prices are not like for like. On Arena Image-to-Video, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 scores 1456 Elo and Veo 3.1 Preview 1398 Elo (Arena, measured September 22, 2026).

Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03

Share this

Side by side

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGrok Imagine Video 1.5Veo 3.1 Preview
Price
Price per video second$0.08$0.40 (720p or 1080p, with audio)
Independent benchmarks
Arena Image-to-Video1456 Elo (#3 of 5) (better)1398 Elo (#5 of 5)
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (image to video)1051 Elo (#2 of 4)Not measured
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (text to video)1058 Elo (#3 of 4)Not measured
Arena Text-to-VideoNot measured1364 Elo (#3 of 5)
Specs
ProviderxAIGoogle
Release dateNot reportedOctober 15, 2025
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image
Outputvideovideo, audio

The two list prices for different tiers, shown in brackets, so neither is marked cheaper.

Scores:Arena · 2026-11-03Artificial Analysis · 2026-11-03Artificial Analysis · 2026-11-03

Open both in the interactive comparison

Charts

Against every current video model

Where Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

On Arena Image-to-Video, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 ranks #3 and Veo 3.1 Preview #5 of 5 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview among the current video models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Image-to-Video

Grok Imagine Video 1.5:#3of 5

1,456 Elo · ahead of 50%

Veo 3.1 Preview:#5of 5

1,398 Elo · ahead of 0%

Arena Text-to-Video

Grok Imagine Video 1.5: Not scored

Veo 3.1 Preview:#3of 5

1,364 Elo · ahead of 50%

Artificial Analysis Video Arena (image to video)

Grok Imagine Video 1.5:#2of 4

1,051 Elo · ahead of 67%

Veo 3.1 Preview: Not scored

Artificial Analysis Video Arena (text to video)

Grok Imagine Video 1.5:#3of 4

1,058 Elo · ahead of 33%

Veo 3.1 Preview: Not scored

Price and context

Price per video second

Grok Imagine Video 1.5:#4of 8

$0.08 · cheaper than 57%

Veo 3.1 Preview:#8of 8

$0.40 · cheaper than 0%

Quality against price

Arena Image-to-Video · measured September 22, 2026

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 scores 1,456 at $0.08; Veo 3.1 Preview scores 1,398 at $0.4 (price per video second). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Image-to-Video score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Image-to-Video score against price for 5 video models, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview marked.1,3801,4001,4201,4401,4601,4801,500$0.10$0.30MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $0.10Median 1,456Price per second of video, log scaleArena Image-to-Video (Elo)Grok Imagine Video 1.5Veo 3.1 Preview
Quality against price: the data
Arena Image-to-Video score against price for 5 video models, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview marked.
ModelProviderPrice per video secondArena Image-to-Video (Elo)
Gemini Omni Flash 1.1Google$0.101,488
Dreamina Seedance 2.5ByteDance Seed$0.231,477
Grok Imagine Video 1.5xAI$0.0801,456
grok-imagine-videoxAI$0.0501,415
Veo 3.1 PreviewGoogle$0.401,398

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

Workload or rateGrok Imagine Video 1.5Veo 3.1 Preview
Example workloads
One minute of video$4.80$24 (720p or 1080p, with audio)

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Where it leads

  • Higher Arena Image-to-Video score, 1456 Elo vs 1398 Elo

Best for

  • Short 1080p clips with sound

Watch out for

  • Editing and extending videos still use the older grok-imagine-video model
  • xAI lists one $0.080 per second price with no breakdown by resolution
  • xAI has not published a release date

Veo 3.1 Preview

Where it leads

  • Also outputs audio
  • Supports sound generation

Best for

  • Gemini API video generation with audio

Watch out for

  • Preview models may change and have stricter rate limits

From benchmark to production

Building on Grok Imagine Video 1.5 or Veo 3.1 Preview?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

FAQ

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Veo 3.1 Preview FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 or Veo 3.1 Preview?

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 lists $0.08 and Veo 3.1 Preview $0.40 (720p or 1080p, with audio) per video second, at different tiers, so the prices are not like for like.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 or Veo 3.1 Preview?

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 leads on Arena Image-to-Video, 1456 Elo to 1398 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

How do Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview differ in features?

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 produces video; Veo 3.1 Preview produces video and audio. Only Veo 3.1 Preview supports sound generation.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Preview?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty