Skip to main content

video model comparison

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Wan 3.0 Video

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Wan 3.0 Video are both current video models, from xAI and Alibaba Qwen. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is 20% cheaper per video second than Wan 3.0 Video, $0.08 vs $0.10.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGrok Imagine Video 1.5Wan 3.0 Video
Price per video second$0.08 (better)$0.10
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (text to video)1048 Elo (#3 of 4)Not measured
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (image to video)1065 Elo (#3 of 3)Not measured
ProviderxAIAlibaba Qwen
Release dateNot reportedAugust 6, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image, video, audio
Outputvideovideo

Scores:Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13

When to choose each

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Best for

  • Short 1080p clips with sound

Watch out for

  • Editing and extending videos still use the older grok-imagine-video model
  • xAI lists one $0.080 per second price with no breakdown by resolution
  • xAI has not published a release date
Full Grok Imagine Video 1.5 profile

Wan 3.0 Video

Best for

  • Long single-shot clips
  • Reference-driven video mixing images, video and audio

Watch out for

  • Alibaba labels it a preview
  • Billing counts input video seconds as well as output, so reference clips add cost
  • The independent leaderboards list a Wan 3.0 with a later date than this API model, so no score is matched to it
Full Wan 3.0 Video profile

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Wan 3.0 Video FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 or Wan 3.0 Video?

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is 20% cheaper per video second than Wan 3.0 Video, $0.08 vs $0.10.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Wan 3.0 Video?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty