Skip to main content

video model comparison

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite vs Wan 3.0 Video

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite and Wan 3.0 Video are both current video models, from xAI and Alibaba Qwen. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite is 80% cheaper per video second than Wan 3.0 Video, $0.02 vs $0.10.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGrok Imagine Video 1.5 LiteWan 3.0 Video
Price per video second$0.02 (better)$0.10
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (text to video)994 Elo (#4 of 4)Not measured
ProviderxAIAlibaba Qwen
Release dateNot reportedAugust 6, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image, video, audio
Outputvideovideo

Scores:Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13

When to choose each

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite

Best for

  • Cheap drafts and simple clips before committing to a higher-end video model

Watch out for

  • xAI has not published a release date; trackers report early October 2026
  • No independent video-quality benchmark is recorded here
Full Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite profile

Wan 3.0 Video

Best for

  • Long single-shot clips
  • Reference-driven video mixing images, video and audio

Watch out for

  • Alibaba labels it a preview
  • Billing counts input video seconds as well as output, so reference clips add cost
  • The independent leaderboards list a Wan 3.0 with a later date than this API model, so no score is matched to it
Full Wan 3.0 Video profile

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite vs Wan 3.0 Video FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite or Wan 3.0 Video?

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite is 80% cheaper per video second than Wan 3.0 Video, $0.02 vs $0.10.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite and Wan 3.0 Video?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty