Skip to main content

video model comparison

Veo 3.1 Preview vs Wan 3.0 Video

Veo 3.1 Preview and Wan 3.0 Video are both current video models, from Google and Alibaba Qwen. Wan 3.0 Video is 75% cheaper per video second than Veo 3.1 Preview, $0.10 vs $0.40.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactVeo 3.1 PreviewWan 3.0 Video
Price per video second$0.40$0.10 (better)
Arena Text-to-Video1364 Elo (#1 of 3)Not measured
Arena Image-to-Video1398 Elo (#2 of 2)Not measured
ProviderGoogleAlibaba Qwen
Release dateOctober 15, 2025August 6, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image, video, audio
Outputvideo, audiovideo

Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12

When to choose each

Veo 3.1 Preview

Best for

  • Gemini API video generation with audio

Watch out for

  • Preview models may change and have stricter rate limits
Full Veo 3.1 Preview profile

Wan 3.0 Video

Best for

  • Long single-shot clips
  • Reference-driven video mixing images, video and audio

Watch out for

  • Alibaba labels it a preview
  • Billing counts input video seconds as well as output, so reference clips add cost
  • The independent leaderboards list a Wan 3.0 with a later date than this API model, so no score is matched to it
Full Wan 3.0 Video profile

Veo 3.1 Preview vs Wan 3.0 Video FAQ

Which is cheaper, Veo 3.1 Preview or Wan 3.0 Video?

Wan 3.0 Video is 75% cheaper per video second than Veo 3.1 Preview, $0.10 vs $0.40.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Veo 3.1 Preview and Wan 3.0 Video?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty