Skip to main content

video model comparison

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Veo 3.1 Lite Preview

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Lite Preview are both current video models, from xAI and Google. Veo 3.1 Lite Preview is 38% cheaper per video second than Grok Imagine Video 1.5, $0.05 vs $0.08.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGrok Imagine Video 1.5Veo 3.1 Lite Preview
Price per video second$0.08$0.05 (better)
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (text to video)1048 Elo (#3 of 4)Not measured
Artificial Analysis Video Arena (image to video)1065 Elo (#3 of 3)Not measured
ProviderxAIGoogle
Release dateNot reportedMarch 31, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image
Outputvideovideo, audio

Scores:Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13Artificial Analysis · 2026-10-13

When to choose each

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Best for

  • Short 1080p clips with sound

Watch out for

  • Editing and extending videos still use the older grok-imagine-video model
  • xAI lists one $0.080 per second price with no breakdown by resolution
  • xAI has not published a release date
Full Grok Imagine Video 1.5 profile

Veo 3.1 Lite Preview

Best for

  • High-volume, cost-sensitive video generation with sound

Watch out for

  • A preview with no 4K output and no video extension
Full Veo 3.1 Lite Preview profile

Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Veo 3.1 Lite Preview FAQ

Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 or Veo 3.1 Lite Preview?

Veo 3.1 Lite Preview is 38% cheaper per video second than Grok Imagine Video 1.5, $0.05 vs $0.08.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Grok Imagine Video 1.5 and Veo 3.1 Lite Preview?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty