Skip to main content

video model comparison

Veo 3.1 Lite Preview vs Wan 3.0 Video

Veo 3.1 Lite Preview and Wan 3.0 Video are both current video models, from Google and Alibaba Qwen. Veo 3.1 Lite Preview is 50% cheaper per video second than Wan 3.0 Video, $0.05 vs $0.10.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactVeo 3.1 Lite PreviewWan 3.0 Video
Price per video second$0.05 (better)$0.10
ProviderGoogleAlibaba Qwen
Release dateMarch 31, 2026August 6, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context windowNot reportedNot reported
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image, video, audio
Outputvideo, audiovideo

When to choose each

Veo 3.1 Lite Preview

Best for

  • High-volume, cost-sensitive video generation with sound

Watch out for

  • A preview with no 4K output and no video extension
Full Veo 3.1 Lite Preview profile

Wan 3.0 Video

Best for

  • Long single-shot clips
  • Reference-driven video mixing images, video and audio

Watch out for

  • Alibaba labels it a preview
  • Billing counts input video seconds as well as output, so reference clips add cost
  • The independent leaderboards list a Wan 3.0 with a later date than this API model, so no score is matched to it
Full Wan 3.0 Video profile

Veo 3.1 Lite Preview vs Wan 3.0 Video FAQ

Which is cheaper, Veo 3.1 Lite Preview or Wan 3.0 Video?

Veo 3.1 Lite Preview is 50% cheaper per video second than Wan 3.0 Video, $0.05 vs $0.10.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Veo 3.1 Lite Preview and Wan 3.0 Video?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty