Skip to main content

Current model · Reflection AI

Beam 1.0 benchmarks, pricing and specs

Beam 1.0 is a Reflection AI model released on October 16, 2026 that takes text input and produces text. Its price is not published and accepts up to 1,000,000 tokens of context.

Context window
1M#26 of 64 current models

Data verified October 23, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-23

Share this

Specs

Key facts

Provider
Reflection AI
Model family
Beam
Release date
October 16, 2026
Status
Current
Access
API and open weights
API model id
Beam-1.0-501B-A23B
Context window
1,000,000 tokens
Max output
Not reported
Input
text
Output
text
Task families
text
Declared capabilities
reasoning, coding, agentic coding

Charts

Against every current text model

Where Beam 1.0 lands among the current models of its task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where it stands

Beam 1.0 is no longer a current model, so it is not ranked; each bar is the share of today's text models its value beats. Each bar is the share of current models it beats.

Beam 1.0 among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Price and context

Context window

#26of 64

1M tokens · longer than 22%

Price

Beam 1.0 pricing

UnitPrice (USD)TierAppliesSource
1M input tokensNot reportedstandardCurrent
1M output tokensNot reportedstandardCurrent
1M input tokensNot reportedcachedCurrent

Benchmarks

Independent benchmark results

Scores come from independent evaluators that ran the model themselves, pinned to a dated snapshot. Rank is among current models in the same snapshot. Reflection AI's own launch figures are listed under strengths with the publisher named, because they are not measured the same way.

No independent benchmark has published a result for Beam 1.0 yet. It is still compared below on price, context and capabilities.

Fit

Strengths, cautions and best uses

Strengths
  • A 501B sparse mixture-of-experts model with 23B active parameters and a 1M-token context, built for coding, reasoning and agents
  • Apache 2.0 weights in BF16, FP8 and NVFP4, with no ban on distillation, fine-tuning or training on its outputs
  • Reflection reports 81.6% on SWE-bench Verified and 90.6% on GPQA Diamond for the BF16 weights
Cautions
  • Reflection API is a public beta that is free to start, with no published per-token price
  • Text only, with no image, audio or video input, and no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet
Best for
  • Self-hosted coding agents under a permissive licence
  • Fine-tuning or distilling a large open model

From benchmark to production

Building on Beam 1.0?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test it against the alternatives on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the model that wins.

Alternatives

Alternatives to Beam 1.0

The closest current text models by price. The cheapest model that scores as well or better is listed first; failing that, the cheapest one within 3% of the benchmark's scale.

FAQ

Beam 1.0 FAQ

What is the context window of Beam 1.0?

Beam 1.0 accepts up to 1,000,000 tokens of context. That ranks #26 of 64 current text models by context length.

Is Beam 1.0 open source or API only?

Beam 1.0 is available both through Reflection AI's API and as open weights you can run yourself.

What are the best alternatives to Beam 1.0?

The closest current alternatives by price and measured performance are Muse Spark Open (from Meta), Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B (262K context window vs 1M), Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (from NVIDIA) and Mercury 3 (from Inception).

Sources

Sources

Cite this page

Van Data Team. "Beam 1.0 Benchmarks, Pricing and Specs." AI Model Benchmark Dataset 2026-10-23. https://vandatateam.com/ai-model-benchmarks/beam-1-0

Reuse the data: JSON · CSV · or explore every model in the AI model benchmark comparison.

Production evaluation

Deciding whether Beam 1.0 fits your workload?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We test the finalists on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • Evaluation cases and acceptance thresholds tied to real work
  • Model routing, fallbacks and cost controls