text model comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 4 Hydrogen are both current text models, from DeepSeek and Google. DeepSeek-V4-Pro is 12% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Gemini 4 Hydrogen, $1.32 vs $1.50. On Arena Text, DeepSeek-V4-Pro scores 1464 Elo and Gemini 4 Hydrogen 1490 Elo (Arena, measured November 11, 2026). Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,000,000 and 1,048,576).
- Higher Arena Text
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen1490 Elo against 1464 Elo
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro$1.32 against $1.50
- Longer context window
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen1.05M tokens against 1M tokens
- Newer release
- Gemini 4 HydrogenNov 2026 against Aug 2026
Data verified November 15, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-15
Side by side
DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 4 Hydrogen, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Gemini 4 Hydrogen |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $1.32 (better) | $1.50 |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $3.96 (better) | $7.50 |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena Text | 1464 Elo (#27 of 50) | 1490 Elo (#7 of 50) (better) |
| Arena WebDev | 1581 Elo (#29 of 45) | 1704 Elo (#7 of 45) (better) |
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% (#22 of 40) | Not measured |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 64.6% (#27 of 39) | Not measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% (#18 of 36) | Not measured |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Release date | August 13, 2026 | November 12, 2026 |
| Access | API and open weights | API only |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Input | text | text, image, audio, video |
| Output | text | text |
Charts
Against every current text model
Where DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 4 Hydrogen land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
On Arena Text, DeepSeek-V4-Pro ranks #27 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen #7 of 50 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#27of 50
1,464 Elo · ahead of 47%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen:#7of 50
1,490 Elo · ahead of 88%
Arena WebDev
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#29of 45
1,581 Elo · ahead of 36%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen:#7of 45
1,704 Elo · ahead of 86%
GPQA Diamond
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#22of 40
91.7% · ahead of 46%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Not scored
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#27of 39
64.6% · ahead of 32%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Not scored
SimpleQA Verified
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#18of 36
52.9% · ahead of 51%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Not scored
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#30of 58
$1.32 · cheaper than 49%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen:#32of 58
$1.50 · cheaper than 44%
Price per 1M output tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#28of 58
$3.96 · cheaper than 53%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen:#36of 58
$7.50 · cheaper than 37%
Context window
DeepSeek-V4-Pro:#31of 68
1M tokens · longer than 22%
Gemini 4 Hydrogen:#12of 68
1.05M tokens · longer than 61%
Quality against price
DeepSeek-V4-Pro scores 1,464 at $1.98; Gemini 4 Hydrogen scores 1,490 at $3 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Carbon | $4 | 1,526 | |
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,522 | |
| Muse Wonder | Meta | $8 | 1,511 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,507 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,497 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,497 |
| Gemini 4 Hydrogen | $3 | 1,490 | |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,487 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | Moonshot Kimi | $4 | 1,485 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,484 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,483 | |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,482 |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,481 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,475 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,475 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,474 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,473 |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,468 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,466 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,464 |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,457 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,457 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,455 | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,453 |
| Step 5 Preview | StepFun | $1.43 | 1,449 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,448 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,441 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Anthropic | $0.20 | 1,421 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $1.05 | 1,420 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Inkling 2 Small | Thinking Machines Lab | $0.47 | 1,412 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,387 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs 1.4 times as much as DeepSeek-V4-Pro, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs 1.4× as much
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- $21.12
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- $30
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs 1.8× as much
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- $9.64
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- $17.18
| Workload or rate | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | Gemini 4 Hydrogen |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $21.12 (better) | $30 |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $9.64 (better) | $17.18 |
| The same, through the batch API | Not listed | $15 |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $0.044 (better) | $0.075 |
| 1M input tokens, batch | Not listed | $0.75 |
| 1M output tokens, batch | Not listed | $3.75 |
| 1M input tokens, off peak | $0.66 | Not listed |
| 1M output tokens, off peak | $1.98 | Not listed |
| 1M input tokens, off-peak, cached | $0.022 | Not listed |
| 1M input tokens, priority | Not listed | $2.70 |
| 1M output tokens, priority | Not listed | $13.50 |
Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.
Launch price $100, regular price $150
Verdict
When to choose each
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Where it leads
- Lower input and output prices, $1.32 and $3.96 vs $1.50 and $7.50 per 1M tokens
- Longer responses, up to 384,000 vs 65,536 output tokens
- Open weights you can run yourself
- Cheaper cached input, $0.044 vs $0.075 per 1M tokens
Best for
- Agentic coding and terminal tasks
- Long-context jobs that need very long outputs
Watch out for
- The recorded rates are peak-hour prices (01:00 to 04:00 and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC on weekdays)
- No image input on the DeepSeek API, where the cheaper deepseek-flash has it
- DeepSeek had planned to retire it in September before extending service, so check its status before a long commitment
Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Where it leads
- Higher Arena Text score, 1490 Elo vs 1464 Elo
- Higher Arena WebDev score, 1704 Elo vs 1581 Elo
- Accepts image, audio and video input
- Batch pricing, $0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens
Best for
- Everyday coding, tool-using agents and parallel sub-agents at a mid-tier price
- Document, chart and video workflows over very long multimodal inputs
Watch out for
- In Google's own table Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on Terminal-Bench 4.1 (63.9% against 57.0%), OSWorld-2.1 (83.9% against 77.6%) and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (59.9% against 51.4%)
- A request returns at most 65,536 output tokens by default; longer outputs, up to 1,048,576 tokens, need Google long-decode mode, and only implicit context caching is supported
- Arena places it below Claude Sonnet 5.5 on WebDev (1704 against 1772) and just below Gemini 3.8 Flash on Arena Text (1490 against 1497), on 4,741 text and 1,997 WebDev votes so far; Epoch AI has not measured it yet
From benchmark to production
Building on DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150
FAQ
DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is 12% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Gemini 4 Hydrogen, $1.32 vs $1.50. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, DeepSeek-V4-Pro costs $21.12 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen $30 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro charges $0.044 per 1M cached input tokens, 97% below its standard input rate, and Gemini 4 Hydrogen $0.075, 95% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, DeepSeek-V4-Pro costs $9.64 and Gemini 4 Hydrogen $17.18.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?
Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads on Arena Text, 1490 Elo to 1464 Elo; Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads on Arena WebDev, 1704 Elo to 1581 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Gemini 4 Hydrogen?
Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,000,000 and 1,048,576). DeepSeek-V4-Pro returns up to 384,000 tokens per response, Gemini 4 Hydrogen 65,536.
How do DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 4 Hydrogen differ in features?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro takes text input; Gemini 4 Hydrogen takes text, image, audio and video.
Can I run DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Gemini 4 Hydrogen myself?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is released as open weights you can run yourself; Gemini 4 Hydrogen is available through its provider's API only.
AI Model Brief
The AI models worth knowing, once a week
What shipped, how it scores on independent benchmarks, what it costs per million tokens and what was deprecated, from the data behind our AI model benchmarks.
We use your address only to send the brief. See our privacy policy.
See this week’s briefFurther reading
More on DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Articles on DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- Gemini 4 Pro Leaks: What's Verified and What's HypeOctober 1, 2026
Related comparisons
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs GLM-5.3
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Grok 4.20
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Grok 4.3
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Kimi K3
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Production evaluation
Choosing between DeepSeek-V4-Pro and Gemini 4 Hydrogen?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty
