text model comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Glimpse
Gemini 3.7 Flash and Glimpse are both current text models, from Google and Elorian. Glimpse is 20% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Gemini 3.7 Flash, $0.60 vs $0.75.
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- Glimpse$0.60 against $0.75
- Newer release
- GlimpseOct 2026 against Aug 2026
Data verified October 29, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-29
Side by side
Gemini 3.7 Flash and Glimpse, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Glimpse |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $0.75 | $0.60 (better) |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $3.75 | $3 (better) |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena Text | 1486 Elo (#10 of 49) | Not measured |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.8% (#5 of 40) | Not measured |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 71.6% (#20 of 40) | Not measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.2% (#9 of 36) | Not measured |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | Elorian | |
| Release date | August 13, 2026 | October 16, 2026 |
| Access | API only | API only |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | Not reported |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | Not reported |
| Input | text, image, audio, video | text, image, video |
| Output | text | text |
No independent benchmark has scored both models yet. Each rank counts the current models scored on that benchmark.
Charts
Against every current text model
Where Gemini 3.7 Flash and Glimpse land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a current Arena Text score: #10 of 49. Each bar is the share of current models it beats.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
Gemini 3.7 Flash:#10of 49
1,486 Elo · ahead of 81%
Glimpse: Not scored
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.7 Flash:#5of 40
94.8% · ahead of 90%
Glimpse: Not scored
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
Gemini 3.7 Flash:#20of 40
71.6% · ahead of 51%
Glimpse: Not scored
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 3.7 Flash:#9of 36
69.2% · ahead of 77%
Glimpse: Not scored
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
Gemini 3.7 Flash:#18of 52
$0.75 · cheaper than 65%
Glimpse:#17of 52
$0.60 · cheaper than 69%
Price per 1M output tokens
Gemini 3.7 Flash:#21of 52
$3.75 · cheaper than 59%
Glimpse:#19of 52
$3 · cheaper than 63%
Context window
Gemini 3.7 Flash:#11of 66
1.05M tokens · longer than 65%
Glimpse: Not listed
Quality against price
Gemini 3.7 Flash scores 1,486 at $1.50 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,525 | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,507 |
| Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,501 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,497 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,494 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,490 |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,488 |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | $1.50 | 1,486 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,484 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,483 |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,482 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,482 | |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,478 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,476 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,475 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,475 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,475 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,466 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,466 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,465 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,461 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,456 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,455 | |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,454 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,452 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,451 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $2.06 | 1,429 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,386 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash costs 1.3 times as much as Glimpse, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
Gemini 3.7 Flash costs 1.3× as much
- Gemini 3.7 Flash
- $15
- Glimpse
- $12
| Workload or rate | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Glimpse |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $15 | $12 (better) |
Verdict
When to choose each
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Where it leads
- Accepts audio input
Best for
- Production coding and agent workflows that need multimodal context
Watch out for
- Google publishes the introductory API price through 2026-12-31; standard input and output prices increase on 2027-01-01.
- Not in the pinned LiveBench snapshot; its independent scores here come from Epoch AI's own GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath and SimpleQA Verified runs
Glimpse
Where it leads
- Lower input and output prices, $0.60 and $3 vs $0.75 and $3.75 per 1M tokens
Best for
- Visual question answering over charts, scenes and short videos
- Counting and captioning at a lower price than frontier multimodal models
Watch out for
- In Elorian's own table GPT-6 Astra scores higher on six of the twelve evaluations, including TOMATO temporal reasoning and Video-MME v2
- Post-trained on an open-weights base model Elorian does not name; it publishes no context window or output limit, and no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet
From benchmark to production
Building on Gemini 3.7 Flash or Glimpse?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
FAQ
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Glimpse FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Glimpse?
Glimpse is 20% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Gemini 3.7 Flash, $0.60 vs $0.75. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $15 and Glimpse $12 at standard rates.
How do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Glimpse differ in features?
Gemini 3.7 Flash takes text, image, audio and video input; Glimpse takes text, image and video.
Further reading
More on Gemini 3.7 Flash and Glimpse
Related comparisons
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Glimpse
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
- Glimpse vs GPT-4.1 mini
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.20
- Glimpse vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.3
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Muse Glimmer
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Production evaluation
Choosing between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Glimpse?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty