Mercury 2.5 benchmarks, pricing and specs
Mercury 2.5 is an Inception model released on September 8, 2026 that takes text input and produces text. It costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.75 per 1M output tokens and accepts up to 260,000 tokens of context.
- Per 1M input tokens
- $0.20
- Per 1M output tokens
- $0.75
- Context window
- 260K
Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13
Key facts
- Provider
- Inception
- Model family
- Mercury
- Release date
- September 8, 2026
- Status
- Current
- Access
- API only
- API model id
- mercury-2.5
- Context window
- 260,000 tokens
- Max output
- 65,536 tokens
- Input
- text
- Output
- text
- Task families
- text
- Declared capabilities
- reasoning
Mercury 2.5 pricing
It is the #6 cheapest of 47 current text models priced per 1M input tokens.
Independent benchmark results
Scores come from independent evaluators that ran the model themselves, pinned to a dated snapshot. Rank is among current models in the same snapshot. Inception's own launch figures are listed under strengths with the publisher named, because they are not measured the same way.
No independent benchmark has published a result for Mercury 2.5 yet. It is still compared below on price, context and capabilities.
Strengths, cautions and best uses
Strengths
- A diffusion language model that refines many tokens in parallel; Inception reports 1,107 tokens per second on widely available NVIDIA GPUs
- Tunable reasoning, parallel tool calls and schema-aligned JSON
- A 260K-token context with up to 65,536 output tokens
Cautions
- Inception publishes no benchmark scores for it, and no independent score is recorded here
- The recorded rates are list prices; an 80% launch discount was running with no published end date
Best for
- Latency-critical agent loops and voice agents
- High-throughput, low-cost text generation
Alternatives to Mercury 2.5
The closest current textmodels by price. The cheapest model that scores as well or better is listed first; failing that, the cheapest one within 3% of the benchmark's scale.
GPT-5.6 Luna
- Same price per 1M input tokens, $0.20
- 1.05M context window vs 260K
- From OpenAI
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 25% more per 1M input tokens, $0.25 vs $0.20
- 1.05M context window vs 260K
- From Google
GLM-5.3-Flash
- 25% cheaper per 1M input tokens, $0.15 vs $0.20
- 1M context window vs 260K
- From Z.ai
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- 30% cheaper per 1M input tokens, $0.14 vs $0.20
- 1M context window vs 260K
- From Xiaomi MiMo
Compare Mercury 2.5 with
Mercury 2.5 FAQ
How much does Mercury 2.5 cost?
Mercury 2.5 costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.75 per 1M output tokens at the standard tier. It is the #6 cheapest of 47 current text models priced per 1M input tokens. Source: Inception, verified October 13, 2026.
What is the context window of Mercury 2.5?
Mercury 2.5 accepts up to 260,000 tokens of context. It can return up to 65,536 tokens in one response. That ranks #50 of 57 current text models by context length.
Is Mercury 2.5 open source or API only?
Mercury 2.5 is available through Inception's API only; its weights are not published.
What are the best alternatives to Mercury 2.5?
The closest current alternatives by price and measured performance are GPT-5.6 Luna (same price per 1M input tokens, $0.20), Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (25% more per 1M input tokens, $0.25 vs $0.20), GLM-5.3-Flash (25% cheaper per 1M input tokens, $0.15 vs $0.20) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (30% cheaper per 1M input tokens, $0.14 vs $0.20).
Sources
- Inception models · Inception · official · verified October 13, 2026
- Introducing Mercury 2.5 · Inception · official · verified October 13, 2026
Cite this page
Van Data Team. "Mercury 2.5 Benchmarks, Pricing and Specs." AI Model Benchmark Dataset 2026-10-13. https://vandatateam.com/ai-model-benchmarks/mercury-2-5
Reuse the data: JSON · CSV · or explore every model in the AI model benchmark comparison.
Production evaluation
Deciding whether Mercury 2.5 fits your workload?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We test the finalists on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- Evaluation cases and acceptance thresholds tied to real work
- Model routing, fallbacks and cost controls
