Skip to main content

text model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon are both current text models, from Google. On Arena Text, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 1487 Elo and Gemini 4 Argon 1520 Elo (Arena, measured October 28, 2026). Both accept 1,048,576 tokens of context.

Higher Arena Text
Gemini 4 Argon1520 Elo against 1487 Elo
Newer release
Gemini 4 ArgonSep 2026 against Feb 2026

Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03

Share this

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 4 Argon
Price
Price per 1M input tokensNot listed$2
Price per 1M output tokensNot listed$10
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text1487 Elo (#10 of 51)1520 Elo (#1 of 51) (better)
Arena WebDev1447 Elo (#36 of 45)1679 Elo (#8 of 45) (better)
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)59.6% (#30 of 42)86% (#10 of 42) (better)
GPQA Diamond94.4% (#6 of 41)96.4% (#1 of 41) (better)
SimpleQA Verified73.5% (#4 of 38)76% (#1 of 38) (better)
Specs
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Release dateFebruary 19, 2026September 30, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image, video
Outputtexttext

Scores:Arena · 2026-11-03Epoch AI · 2026-11-03

Open both in the interactive comparison

Charts

Against every current text model

Where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

On Arena Text, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks #10 and Gemini 4 Argon #1 of 51 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Text

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview:#10of 51

1,487 Elo · ahead of 82%

Gemini 4 Argon:#1of 51

1,520 Elo · ahead of 100%

Arena WebDev

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview:#36of 45

1,447 Elo · ahead of 20%

Gemini 4 Argon:#8of 45

1,679 Elo · ahead of 84%

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview:#30of 42

59.6% · ahead of 29%

Gemini 4 Argon:#10of 42

86% · ahead of 76%

GPQA Diamond

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview:#6of 41

94.4% · ahead of 88%

Gemini 4 Argon:#1of 41

96.4% · ahead of 100%

SimpleQA Verified

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview:#4of 38

73.5% · ahead of 92%

Gemini 4 Argon:#1of 38

76% · ahead of 100%

Price and context

Price per 1M input tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Not listed

Gemini 4 Argon:#29of 52

$2 · cheaper than 24%

Price per 1M output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Not listed

Gemini 4 Argon:#34of 52

$10 · cheaper than 25%

Context window

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview:#11of 64

1.05M tokens · longer than 67%

Gemini 4 Argon:#11of 64

1.05M tokens · longer than 67%

Quality against price

Arena Text · measured October 28, 2026

Gemini 4 Argon scores 1,520 at $4 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Text score against price for 43 text models, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon marked.1,2501,3001,3501,4001,4501,5001,550$0.30$1$3$10MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $3Median 1,475Blended price per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scaleArena Text (Elo)Gemini 4 Argon
Quality against price: the data
Arena Text score against price for 43 text models, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon marked.
ModelProviderBlended price per 1M tokensArena Text (Elo)
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle$41,520
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$81,509
Muse WonderMeta$81,507
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$201,504
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic$201,504
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$1.501,496
Muse Spark 1.3Meta$21,495
Claude Opus 5Anthropic$101,492
Kimi K3Moonshot Kimi$61,488
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$81,485
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle$31,483
GPT-5.5OpenAI$111,482
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic$101,482
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Qwen$31,482
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI$41,481
GLM-5.3Z.ai$2.151,481
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi MiMo$0.541,480
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$41,477
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai$0.241,477
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI$201,476
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek$0.521,476
GPT-5.4OpenAI$5.631,475
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle$1.131,473
Grok 4.20xAI$1.561,472
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.501,467
Grok 4.5xAI$31,465
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$1.981,465
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$41,462
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$41,458
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.851,456
Grok 4.6xAI$31,455
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.451,453
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi MiMo$0.181,448
Step 5 PreviewStepFun$1.431,448
Grok 4.3xAI$1.561,442
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.201,441
Grok 4.7xAI$31,441
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI$1.051,432
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic$0.201,425
GPT-4.1OpenAI$3.501,415
Solar Pro 4Upstage$0.521,388
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI$0.701,383
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI$0.181,322

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

Workload or rateGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 4 Argon
Other listed rates
1M input tokens, cachedNot listed$0.10
1M input tokens, cached, prompts over 200K tokens$0.40Not listed
1M input tokens, cached, prompts up to 200K tokens$0.20Not listed
1M input tokens, prompts over 200K tokens$4Not listed
1M output tokens, prompts over 200K tokens$18Not listed
1M input tokens, prompts up to 200K tokens$2Not listed
1M output tokens, prompts up to 200K tokens$12Not listed

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Where it leads

  • Accepts audio input

Best for

  • Multimodal reasoning and agentic coding evaluations

Watch out for

  • This preview endpoint may change before becoming stable; production use should account for its published prompt-length price tiers

Gemini 4 Argon

Where it leads

  • Higher Arena Text score, 1520 Elo vs 1487 Elo
  • Higher Arena WebDev score, 1679 Elo vs 1447 Elo
  • Higher FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) score, 86% vs 59.6%
  • Higher GPQA Diamond score, 96.4% vs 94.4%
  • Higher SimpleQA Verified score, 76% vs 73.5%
  • Longer responses, up to 1,000,000 vs 65,536 output tokens
  • A cached-input rate, $0.10 per 1M tokens

Best for

  • Long-horizon coding and knowledge work once it reaches general API access

Watch out for

  • The $2 input and $10 output rates are introductory and end on November 30, 2026; from December 1 Google charges $4 and $20 per 1M tokens
  • Not on the Gemini API free tier, and explicit context caching is not supported; implicit caching takes 95% off repeated input
  • Answers longer than 64K tokens need background execution, and Google advises client timeouts of at least 15 minutes for hard prompts

From benchmark to production

Building on Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 4 Argon?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

FAQ

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon FAQ

Do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon discount cached input?

Gemini 4 Argon lists a cached-input rate of $0.10 per 1M tokens, 95% below its standard input rate. No cached-input rate is listed for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon leads on Arena Text, 1520 Elo to 1487 Elo; Gemini 4 Argon leads on Arena WebDev, 1679 Elo to 1447 Elo; Gemini 4 Argon leads on FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2), 86% to 59.6%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 4 Argon?

Both accept 1,048,576 tokens of context. Gemini 4 Argon returns up to 1,000,000 tokens per response, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 65,536.

How do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon differ in features?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes text, image, audio and video input; Gemini 4 Argon takes text, image and video.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty