Skip to main content

text model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Glimpse

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse are both current text models, from Google and Elorian. Glimpse is 20% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Gemini 3.8 Flash, $0.60 vs $0.75.

Lower price per 1M input tokens
Glimpse$0.60 against $0.75
Newer release
GlimpseOct 2026 against Sep 2026

Data verified October 29, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-29

Share this

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGemini 3.8 FlashGlimpse
Price
Price per 1M input tokens$0.75$0.60 (better)
Price per 1M output tokens$3.75$3 (better)
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text1497 Elo (#5 of 47)Not measured
GPQA Diamond95.4% (#3 of 38)Not measured
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)68.4% (#21 of 38)Not measured
SimpleQA Verified69.7% (#7 of 34)Not measured
Specs
ProviderGoogleElorian
Release dateSeptember 2, 2026October 16, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window1,048,576 tokensNot reported
Max output65,536 tokensNot reported
Inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image, video
Outputtexttext

No independent benchmark has scored both models yet. Each rank counts the current models scored on that benchmark.

Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12Epoch AI · 2026-10-12

Charts

Against every current text model

Where Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a current Arena Text score: #5 of 47. Each bar is the share of current models it beats.

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Text

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#5of 47

1,497 Elo · ahead of 91%

Glimpse: Not scored

GPQA Diamond

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#3of 38

95.4% · ahead of 92%

Glimpse: Not scored

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#21of 38

68.4% · ahead of 46%

Glimpse: Not scored

SimpleQA Verified

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#7of 34

69.7% · ahead of 79%

Glimpse: Not scored

Price and context

Price per 1M input tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#18of 51

$0.75 · cheaper than 66%

Glimpse:#17of 51

$0.60 · cheaper than 68%

Price per 1M output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#21of 51

$3.75 · cheaper than 60%

Glimpse:#19of 51

$3 · cheaper than 62%

Context window

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#11of 64

1.05M tokens · longer than 67%

Glimpse: Not listed

Quality against price

Arena Text · measured October 8, 2026

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 1,497 at $1.50 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Text score against price for 40 text models, Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse marked.1,2501,3001,3501,4001,4501,5001,550$0.30$1$3$10MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $3Median 1,475Blended price per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scaleArena Text (Elo)Gemini 3.8 Flash
Quality against price: the data
Arena Text score against price for 40 text models, Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse marked.
ModelProviderBlended price per 1M tokensArena Text (Elo)
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle$41,525
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$81,507
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$201,504
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic$201,501
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$1.501,497
Muse Spark 1.3Meta$21,494
Claude Opus 5Anthropic$101,490
Kimi K3Moonshot Kimi$61,488
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$81,485
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI$41,484
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Qwen$31,483
GPT-5.5OpenAI$111,482
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle$31,482
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic$101,481
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi MiMo$0.541,480
GLM-5.3Z.ai$2.151,478
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$41,476
GPT-5.4OpenAI$5.631,475
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI$201,475
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek$0.521,475
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai$0.241,475
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle$1.131,473
Grok 4.20xAI$1.561,472
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.501,466
Grok 4.5xAI$31,466
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$1.981,465
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$41,461
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$41,456
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.851,455
Grok 4.6xAI$31,454
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.451,452
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi MiMo$0.181,451
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.201,443
Grok 4.7xAI$31,443
Grok 4.3xAI$1.561,442
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI$2.061,429
GPT-4.1OpenAI$3.501,415
Solar Pro 4Upstage$0.521,386
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI$0.701,383
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI$0.181,322

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

The same work, priced

For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 1.3 times as much as Glimpse, at each provider's listed rates.

What Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse cost for the same work, at the rates each provider lists.
  • 10M input and 2M output tokens

    Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 1.3× as much

    Gemini 3.8 Flash
    $15
    Glimpse
    $12
Workload or rateGemini 3.8 FlashGlimpse
Example workloads
10M input and 2M output tokens$15$12 (better)
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached$8.93Not listed
The same, through the batch API$7.50Not listed
Other listed rates
1M input tokens, cached$0.075Not listed
1M input tokens, batch$0.375Not listed
1M output tokens, batch$1.875Not listed
1M input tokens, priority$1.35Not listed
1M output tokens, priority$6.75Not listed

Verdict

When to choose each

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Where it leads

  • Accepts audio input
  • A cached-input rate, $0.075 per 1M tokens
  • Batch pricing, $0.375 input and $1.875 output per 1M tokens

Best for

  • High-volume agentic and coding workloads where per-token cost dominates the decision
  • Multimodal pipelines that need audio, video and PDF input in one model

Watch out for

  • The listed price is promotional and ends 31 December 2026; on 1 January 2027 input and output both double, to $1.50 and $7.50, and cached input goes from $0.075 to $0.15
  • Output pricing is billed inclusive of thinking tokens, so reasoning-heavy prompts cost more than the output length suggests
  • Google’s published comparisons are against its own previous Flash release and were not independently reproduced here

Glimpse

Where it leads

  • Lower input and output prices, $0.60 and $3 vs $0.75 and $3.75 per 1M tokens

Best for

  • Visual question answering over charts, scenes and short videos
  • Counting and captioning at a lower price than frontier multimodal models

Watch out for

  • In Elorian's own table GPT-6 Astra scores higher on six of the twelve evaluations, including TOMATO temporal reasoning and Video-MME v2
  • Post-trained on an open-weights base model Elorian does not name; it publishes no context window or output limit, and no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet

From benchmark to production

Building on Gemini 3.8 Flash or Glimpse?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

FAQ

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Glimpse FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Glimpse?

Glimpse is 20% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Gemini 3.8 Flash, $0.60 vs $0.75. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $15 and Glimpse $12 at standard rates.

Do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse discount cached input?

Gemini 3.8 Flash lists a cached-input rate of $0.075 per 1M tokens, 90% below its standard input rate. No cached-input rate is listed for Glimpse.

How do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse differ in features?

Gemini 3.8 Flash takes text, image, audio and video input; Glimpse takes text, image and video.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Glimpse?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty