text model comparison
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.3
Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.3 are both current text models, from Google and xAI. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 40% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Grok 4.3, $0.75 vs $1.25. On Arena Text, Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 1497 Elo and Grok 4.3 1442 Elo (Arena, measured October 8, 2026). Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,048,576 and 1,000,000).
- Higher Arena Text
- Gemini 3.8 Flash1497 Elo against 1442 Elo
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.75 against $1.25
- Longer context window
- Gemini 3.8 Flash1.05M tokens against 1M tokens
Data verified October 23, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-28
Side by side
Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.3, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $0.75 (better) | $1.25 |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $3.75 | $2.50 (better) |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena Text | 1497 Elo (#5 of 49) (better) | 1442 Elo (#39 of 49) |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% (#3 of 40) (better) | 88.8% (#32 of 40) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 68.4% (#22 of 40) (better) | 42.8% (#35 of 40) |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% (#7 of 36) (better) | 33.2% (#30 of 36) |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | xAI | |
| Release date | September 2, 2026 | Not reported |
| Access | API only | API only |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | Not reported |
| Input | text, image, audio, video | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
Charts
Against every current text model
Where Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.3 land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
On Arena Text, Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks #5 and Grok 4.3 #39 of 49 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
Gemini 3.8 Flash:#5of 49
1,497 Elo · ahead of 92%
Grok 4.3:#39of 49
1,442 Elo · ahead of 21%
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.8 Flash:#3of 40
95.4% · ahead of 92%
Grok 4.3:#32of 40
88.8% · ahead of 21%
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
Gemini 3.8 Flash:#22of 40
68.4% · ahead of 46%
Grok 4.3:#35of 40
42.8% · ahead of 13%
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 3.8 Flash:#7of 36
69.7% · ahead of 80%
Grok 4.3:#30of 36
33.2% · ahead of 17%
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash:#17of 51
$0.75 · cheaper than 66%
Grok 4.3:#21of 51
$1.25 · cheaper than 56%
Price per 1M output tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash:#20of 51
$3.75 · cheaper than 60%
Grok 4.3:#15of 51
$2.50 · cheaper than 68%
Context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash:#11of 66
1.05M tokens · longer than 65%
Grok 4.3:#28of 66
1M tokens · longer than 22%
Quality against price
Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 1,497 at $1.50; Grok 4.3 scores 1,442 at $1.56 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,525 | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,507 |
| Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,501 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,497 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,494 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,490 |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,488 |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | $1.50 | 1,486 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,484 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,483 |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,482 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,482 | |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,478 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,476 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,475 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,475 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,475 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,466 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,466 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,465 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,461 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,456 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,455 | |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,454 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,452 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,451 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $2.06 | 1,429 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,386 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Grok 4.3 costs 1.2 times as much as Gemini 3.8 Flash, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
Grok 4.3 costs 1.2× as much
- Gemini 3.8 Flash
- $15
- Grok 4.3
- $17.50
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 1.1× as much
- Gemini 3.8 Flash
- $8.93
- Grok 4.3
- $8.05
| Workload or rate | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $15 (better) | $17.50 |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $8.93 | $8.05 (better) |
| The same, through the batch API | $7.50 | Not listed |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $0.075 (better) | $0.20 |
| 1M input tokens, batch | $0.375 | Not listed |
| 1M output tokens, batch | $1.875 | Not listed |
| 1M input tokens, priority | $1.35 | Not listed |
| 1M output tokens, priority | $6.75 | Not listed |
Verdict
When to choose each
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Where it leads
- Lower price per 1M input tokens, $0.75 vs $1.25
- Lower cost for 10M input and 2M output tokens, $15 vs $17.50
- Higher Arena Text score, 1497 Elo vs 1442 Elo
- Higher GPQA Diamond score, 95.4% vs 88.8%
- Higher FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) score, 68.4% vs 42.8%
- Higher SimpleQA Verified score, 69.7% vs 33.2%
- Accepts audio and video input
- Cheaper cached input, $0.075 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens
Best for
- High-volume agentic and coding workloads where per-token cost dominates the decision
- Multimodal pipelines that need audio, video and PDF input in one model
Watch out for
- The listed price is promotional and ends 31 December 2026; on 1 January 2027 input and output both double, to $1.50 and $7.50, and cached input goes from $0.075 to $0.15
- Output pricing is billed inclusive of thinking tokens, so reasoning-heavy prompts cost more than the output length suggests
- Google’s published comparisons are against its own previous Flash release and were not independently reproduced here
Grok 4.3
Where it leads
- Lower price per 1M output tokens, $2.50 vs $3.75
Best for
- General-purpose reasoning, instruction following, and agentic tool-use evaluations
Watch out for
- The published base rates double when requests reach the provider's 200,000-token long-context threshold
From benchmark to production
Building on Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.3?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
FAQ
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.3 FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.3?
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 40% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Grok 4.3, $0.75 vs $1.25. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $15 and Grok 4.3 $17.50 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.3?
Gemini 3.8 Flash charges $0.075 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and Grok 4.3 $0.20, 84% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $8.93 and Grok 4.3 $8.05.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.3?
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads on Arena Text, 1497 Elo to 1442 Elo; Gemini 3.8 Flash leads on GPQA Diamond, 95.4% to 88.8%; Gemini 3.8 Flash leads on FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2), 68.4% to 42.8%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Grok 4.3?
Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,048,576 and 1,000,000).
How do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.3 differ in features?
Gemini 3.8 Flash takes text, image, audio and video input; Grok 4.3 takes text and image.
Further reading
More on Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.3
Articles on Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.3
- Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS: Price, Rankings and the Fine PrintSeptember 25, 2026
Related comparisons
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6 Luna vs Grok 4.3
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Grok 4.3 vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Grok 4.3
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.3
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Grok 4.3 vs Grok 4.6
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Grok 4.3
Production evaluation
Choosing between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Grok 4.3?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty
