Skip to main content
Van Data Team

text model comparison

Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL are both current text models, from Meta and NVIDIA. On Arena Text, Muse Wonder scores 1507 Elo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1412 Elo (Arena, measured October 28, 2026). Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,048,576 and 1,000,000).

Higher Arena Text
Muse Wonder1507 Elo against 1412 Elo
Longer context window
Muse Wonder1.05M tokens against 1M tokens
Newer release
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLOct 2026 against Oct 2026

Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03

Share this

Side by side

Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactMuse WonderNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Price
Price per 1M input tokens$4Not listed
Price per 1M output tokens$20Not listed
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text1507 Elo (#3 of 51) (better)1412 Elo (#45 of 51)
Arena WebDev1652 Elo (#15 of 45) (better)1399 Elo (#41 of 45)
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)82.1% (#14 of 42)Not measured
Specs
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Release dateOctober 12, 2026October 15, 2026
AccessAPI onlyopen weights
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, image, audio, videotext, image, video
Outputtexttext

Scores:Arena · 2026-11-03Epoch AI · 2026-11-03

Open both in the interactive comparison

Charts

Against every current text model

Where Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

On Arena Text, Muse Wonder ranks #3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL #45 of 51 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.

Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Text

Muse Wonder:#3of 51

1,507 Elo · ahead of 96%

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL:#45of 51

1,412 Elo · ahead of 12%

Arena WebDev

Muse Wonder:#15of 45

1,652 Elo · ahead of 68%

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL:#41of 45

1,399 Elo · ahead of 9%

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)

Muse Wonder:#14of 42

82.1% · ahead of 66%

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: Not scored

Price and context

Price per 1M input tokens

Muse Wonder:#43of 52

$4 · cheaper than 14%

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: Not listed

Price per 1M output tokens

Muse Wonder:#43of 52

$20 · cheaper than 14%

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: Not listed

Context window

Muse Wonder:#11of 64

1.05M tokens · longer than 67%

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL:#26of 64

1M tokens · longer than 22%

Scores fromArena · 2026-11-03Epoch AI · 2026-11-03

Quality against price

Arena Text · measured October 28, 2026

Muse Wonder scores 1,507 at $8 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Text score against price for 43 text models, Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL marked.1,2501,3001,3501,4001,4501,5001,550$0.30$1$3$10MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $3Median 1,475Blended price per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scaleArena Text (Elo)Muse Wonder
Quality against price: the data
Arena Text score against price for 43 text models, Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL marked.
ModelProviderBlended price per 1M tokensArena Text (Elo)
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle$41,520
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$81,509
Muse WonderMeta$81,507
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$201,504
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic$201,504
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$1.501,496
Muse Spark 1.3Meta$21,495
Claude Opus 5Anthropic$101,492
Kimi K3Moonshot Kimi$61,488
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$81,485
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle$31,483
GPT-5.5OpenAI$111,482
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic$101,482
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Qwen$31,482
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI$41,481
GLM-5.3Z.ai$2.151,481
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi MiMo$0.541,480
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$41,477
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai$0.241,477
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI$201,476
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek$0.521,476
GPT-5.4OpenAI$5.631,475
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle$1.131,473
Grok 4.20xAI$1.561,472
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.501,467
Grok 4.5xAI$31,465
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$1.981,465
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$41,462
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$41,458
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.851,456
Grok 4.6xAI$31,455
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.451,453
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi MiMo$0.181,448
Step 5 PreviewStepFun$1.431,448
Grok 4.3xAI$1.561,442
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.201,441
Grok 4.7xAI$31,441
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI$1.051,432
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic$0.201,425
GPT-4.1OpenAI$3.501,415
Solar Pro 4Upstage$0.521,388
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI$0.701,383
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI$0.181,322

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

Workload or rateMuse WonderNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Other listed rates
1M input tokens, cached$0.20Not listed

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

Muse Wonder

Where it leads

  • Higher Arena Text score, 1507 Elo vs 1412 Elo
  • Higher Arena WebDev score, 1652 Elo vs 1399 Elo
  • Accepts audio input
  • A cached-input rate, $0.20 per 1M tokens

Best for

  • Multi-file coding changes and multi-hour agent runs
  • Sub-agent orchestration where capability matters more than cost

Watch out for

  • Meta lists it as a preview, and the Model API serves Standard mode only, with no discounted Contributor tier
  • The higher-capability Muse Wonder Full is only available through Muse Code subscriptions, not per token
Full Muse Wonder profile

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Where it leads

  • Open weights you can run yourself

Best for

  • Agents that read screenshots, charts and documents
  • Self-hosted multimodal agents on NVIDIA hardware

Watch out for

  • NVIDIA calls it 5x faster than the next best open model in its class; that speed claim is not measured independently here
  • NVIDIA sells no per-token API for it, so hosted prices come from third parties
Full Nemotron 3.5 Super VL profile

From benchmark to production

Building on Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

Book the cost auditAI agent development

FAQ

Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL FAQ

Do Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL discount cached input?

Muse Wonder lists a cached-input rate of $0.20 per 1M tokens, 95% below its standard input rate. No cached-input rate is listed for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Muse Wonder leads on Arena Text, 1507 Elo to 1412 Elo; Muse Wonder leads on Arena WebDev, 1652 Elo to 1399 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Which has the larger context window, Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,048,576 and 1,000,000).

How do Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL differ in features?

Muse Wonder takes text, image, audio and video input; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL takes text, image and video.

Can I run Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL myself?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is released as open weights you can run yourself; Muse Wonder is available through its provider's API only.

Further reading

More on Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Articles on Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Related comparisons

Production evaluation

Choosing between Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty
Compare all modelsBook a consultation