text model comparison
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Grok 4.5
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Grok 4.5 are both current text models, from DeepSeek and xAI. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 85% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Grok 4.5, $0.30 vs $2. On Arena Text, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores 1475 Elo and Grok 4.5 1466 Elo (Arena, measured October 8, 2026). DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has the larger context window, 1,000,000 vs 500,000 tokens.
Data verified October 12, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-12
Side by side
Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per 1M input tokens | $0.30 (better) | $2 |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $1.20 (better) | $6 |
| Cost of 10M input and 2M output tokens | $5.40 (better) | $32 |
| Arena Text | 1475 Elo (#18 of 39) (better) | 1466 Elo (#23 of 39) |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% (#25 of 37) | 93.4% (#12 of 37) (better) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 67.4% (#22 of 37) (better) | 57.2% (#28 of 37) |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 48.3% (#20 of 34) |
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Release date | September 10, 2026 | July 16, 2026 |
| Access | API and open weights | API only |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 500,000 tokens |
| Max output | 384,000 tokens | Not reported |
| Input | text, image | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
When to choose each
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Best for
- High-volume agent and multimodal workloads where per-token cost dominates
- Teams that want a frontier-adjacent model they can also self-host under MIT terms
Watch out for
- The recorded API rates are the peak-hour prices; DeepSeek charges half outside 01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC on weekdays
- Running the open weights moves cost to your own infrastructure, which the token rates here do not represent
Grok 4.5
Best for
- Coding and agentic API evaluations below the long-context pricing threshold
Watch out for
- The published base rates increase for requests at or above the provider long-context threshold
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Grok 4.5 FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Grok 4.5?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 85% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Grok 4.5, $0.30 vs $2. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs $5.40 and Grok 4.5 $32 at standard rates.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Grok 4.5?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads on Arena Text, 1475 Elo to 1466 Elo; Grok 4.5 leads on GPQA Diamond, 93.4% to 89.8%; DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads on FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2), 67.4% to 57.2%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Grok 4.5?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has the larger context window, 1,000,000 vs 500,000 tokens.
Can I run DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Grok 4.5 myself?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is released as open weights you can run yourself; Grok 4.5 is available through its provider's API only.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.5
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GPT-4.1 mini
Production evaluation
Choosing between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Grok 4.5?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty