Skip to main content

text model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3

Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 are both current text models, from Google and Z.ai. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 46% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GLM-5.3, $0.75 vs $1.40. On Arena Text, Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 1496 Elo and GLM-5.3 1481 Elo (Arena, measured October 28, 2026). Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,048,576 and 1,000,000).

Higher Arena Text
Gemini 3.8 Flash1496 Elo against 1481 Elo
Lower price per 1M input tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.75 against $1.40
Longer context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash1.05M tokens against 1M tokens
Newer release
Gemini 3.8 FlashSep 2026 against Aug 2026

Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03

Share this

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGemini 3.8 FlashGLM-5.3
Price
Price per 1M input tokens$0.75 (better)$1.40
Price per 1M output tokens$3.75 (better)$4.40
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text1496 Elo (#6 of 51) (better)1481 Elo (#16 of 51)
Arena WebDev1583 Elo (#25 of 45)1623 Elo (#21 of 45) (better)
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)68.4% (#26 of 42)68.8% (#25 of 42) (better)
GPQA Diamond95.4% (#4 of 41) (better)90.9% (#23 of 41)
SimpleQA Verified69.7% (#8 of 38) (better)41% (#29 of 38)
Specs
ProviderGoogleZ.ai
Release dateSeptember 2, 2026August 18, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI and open weights
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens128,000 tokens
Inputtext, image, audio, videotext
Outputtexttext

Scores:Arena · 2026-11-03Epoch AI · 2026-11-03

Open both in the interactive comparison

Charts

Against every current text model

Where Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

On Arena Text, Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks #6 and GLM-5.3 #16 of 51 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.

Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Text

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#6of 51

1,496 Elo · ahead of 90%

GLM-5.3:#16of 51

1,481 Elo · ahead of 68%

Arena WebDev

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#25of 45

1,583 Elo · ahead of 45%

GLM-5.3:#21of 45

1,623 Elo · ahead of 55%

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#26of 42

68.4% · ahead of 39%

GLM-5.3:#25of 42

68.8% · ahead of 41%

GPQA Diamond

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#4of 41

95.4% · ahead of 90%

GLM-5.3:#23of 41

90.9% · ahead of 45%

SimpleQA Verified

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#8of 38

69.7% · ahead of 78%

GLM-5.3:#29of 38

41% · ahead of 22%

Price and context

Price per 1M input tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#20of 52

$0.75 · cheaper than 63%

GLM-5.3:#27of 52

$1.40 · cheaper than 49%

Price per 1M output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#23of 52

$3.75 · cheaper than 57%

GLM-5.3:#26of 52

$4.40 · cheaper than 51%

Context window

Gemini 3.8 Flash:#11of 64

1.05M tokens · longer than 67%

GLM-5.3:#26of 64

1M tokens · longer than 22%

Quality against price

Arena Text · measured October 28, 2026

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 1,496 at $1.50; GLM-5.3 scores 1,481 at $2.15 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Text score against price for 43 text models, Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 marked.1,2501,3001,3501,4001,4501,5001,550$0.30$1$3$10MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $3Median 1,475Blended price per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scaleArena Text (Elo)Gemini 3.8 FlashGLM-5.3
Quality against price: the data
Arena Text score against price for 43 text models, Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 marked.
ModelProviderBlended price per 1M tokensArena Text (Elo)
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle$41,520
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$81,509
Muse WonderMeta$81,507
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$201,504
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic$201,504
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$1.501,496
Muse Spark 1.3Meta$21,495
Claude Opus 5Anthropic$101,492
Kimi K3Moonshot Kimi$61,488
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$81,485
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle$31,483
GPT-5.5OpenAI$111,482
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic$101,482
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Qwen$31,482
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI$41,481
GLM-5.3Z.ai$2.151,481
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi MiMo$0.541,480
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$41,477
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai$0.241,477
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI$201,476
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek$0.521,476
GPT-5.4OpenAI$5.631,475
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle$1.131,473
Grok 4.20xAI$1.561,472
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.501,467
Grok 4.5xAI$31,465
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$1.981,465
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$41,462
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$41,458
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.851,456
Grok 4.6xAI$31,455
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.451,453
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi MiMo$0.181,448
Step 5 PreviewStepFun$1.431,448
Grok 4.3xAI$1.561,442
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.201,441
Grok 4.7xAI$31,441
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI$1.051,432
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic$0.201,425
GPT-4.1OpenAI$3.501,415
Solar Pro 4Upstage$0.521,388
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI$0.701,383
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI$0.181,322

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

The same work, priced

For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GLM-5.3 costs 1.5 times as much as Gemini 3.8 Flash, at each provider's listed rates.

What Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 cost for the same work, at the rates each provider lists.
  • 10M input and 2M output tokens

    GLM-5.3 costs 1.5× as much

    Gemini 3.8 Flash
    $15
    GLM-5.3
    $22.80
  • The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached

    GLM-5.3 costs 1.4× as much

    Gemini 3.8 Flash
    $8.93
    GLM-5.3
    $12.54
Workload or rateGemini 3.8 FlashGLM-5.3
Example workloads
10M input and 2M output tokens$15 (better)$22.80
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached$8.93 (better)$12.54
The same, through the batch API$7.50Not listed
Other listed rates
1M input tokens, cached$0.075 (better)$0.26
1M input tokens, batch$0.375Not listed
1M output tokens, batch$1.875Not listed
1M input tokens, priority$1.35Not listed
1M output tokens, priority$6.75Not listed

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Where it leads

  • Lower input and output prices, $0.75 and $3.75 vs $1.40 and $4.40 per 1M tokens
  • Higher Arena Text score, 1496 Elo vs 1481 Elo
  • Higher GPQA Diamond score, 95.4% vs 90.9%
  • Higher SimpleQA Verified score, 69.7% vs 41%
  • Accepts image, audio and video input
  • Cheaper cached input, $0.075 vs $0.26 per 1M tokens
  • Batch pricing, $0.375 input and $1.875 output per 1M tokens

Best for

  • High-volume agentic and coding workloads where per-token cost dominates the decision
  • Multimodal pipelines that need audio, video and PDF input in one model

Watch out for

  • The listed price is promotional and ends 31 December 2026; on 1 January 2027 input and output both double, to $1.50 and $7.50, and cached input goes from $0.075 to $0.15
  • Output pricing is billed inclusive of thinking tokens, so reasoning-heavy prompts cost more than the output length suggests
  • Google’s published comparisons are against its own previous Flash release and were not independently reproduced here

GLM-5.3

Where it leads

  • Higher Arena WebDev score, 1623 Elo vs 1583 Elo
  • Higher FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) score, 68.8% vs 68.4%
  • Longer responses, up to 128,000 vs 65,536 output tokens
  • Open weights you can run yourself

Best for

  • Long-horizon agentic coding
  • Self-hosted reasoning with permissive weights

Watch out for

  • Text input only, and reasoning cannot be turned off: requests that disable thinking fail
  • The licence requires a Z.ai security review before very large model-as-a-service operators use it commercially

From benchmark to production

Building on Gemini 3.8 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

FAQ

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3 FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 46% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GLM-5.3, $0.75 vs $1.40. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $15 and GLM-5.3 $22.80 at standard rates.

Which is cheaper with prompt caching, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash charges $0.075 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and GLM-5.3 $0.26, 81% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $8.93 and GLM-5.3 $12.54.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads on Arena Text, 1496 Elo to 1481 Elo; GLM-5.3 leads on Arena WebDev, 1623 Elo to 1583 Elo; GLM-5.3 leads on FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2), 68.8% to 68.4%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Which has the larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GLM-5.3?

Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,048,576 and 1,000,000). GLM-5.3 returns up to 128,000 tokens per response, Gemini 3.8 Flash 65,536.

How do Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3 differ in features?

Gemini 3.8 Flash takes text, image, audio and video input; GLM-5.3 takes text.

Can I run Gemini 3.8 Flash or GLM-5.3 myself?

GLM-5.3 is released as open weights you can run yourself; Gemini 3.8 Flash is available through its provider's API only.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Gemini 3.8 Flash and GLM-5.3?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty