Skip to main content

text model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

GPT-6 Luna and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are both current text models, from OpenAI and Xiaomi MiMo. GPT-6 Luna is 29% cheaper per 1M input tokens than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, $0.10 vs $0.14. On Arena Text, GPT-6 Luna scores 1443 Elo and MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1451 Elo (Arena, measured October 8, 2026). GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window, 1,050,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens.

Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13

Share this

Side by side

Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price per 1M input tokens$0.10 (better)$0.14
Price per 1M output tokens$0.50$0.28 (better)
Cost of 10M input and 2M output tokens$2$1.96 (better)
Arena Text1443 Elo (#37 of 49)1451 Elo (#35 of 49) (better)
GPQA Diamond90.5% (#25 of 40)Not measured
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)78.9% (#14 of 40)Not measured
SimpleQA Verified41.4% (#26 of 36)Not measured
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi MiMo
Release dateSeptember 22, 2026September 22, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI and open weights
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Inputtext, imagetext, image, audio, video
Outputtexttext

Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12Epoch AI · 2026-10-12

Open both in the interactive comparison

When to choose each

GPT-6 Luna

Best for

  • High-volume summarisation, extraction and routing
  • Long-context budget work, where the 272k threshold is more forgiving than Haiku 5.5's 100k

Watch out for

  • Prompts over 272,000 tokens are rebilled at $0.20 input and $0.75 output for the whole request
  • A twentieth of GPT-6 Sol's price reflects a capability gap, not a discount on the same model
Full GPT-6 Luna profile

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Best for

  • High-frequency multimodal calls
  • Low-cost agent workloads

Watch out for

  • Xiaomi's own table puts it well behind the Pro model on exploitation tasks (ExploitBench 25.3 against 47.9)
  • The API checkpoint (RL or MOPD weights) is not identified
Full MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile

GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

GPT-6 Luna is 29% cheaper per 1M input tokens than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, $0.10 vs $0.14. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Luna costs $2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash $1.96 at standard rates.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, GPT-6 Luna or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads on Arena Text, 1451 Elo to 1443 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Luna or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window, 1,050,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens.

Can I run GPT-6 Luna or MiMo-V2.6-Flash myself?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is released as open weights you can run yourself; GPT-6 Luna is available through its provider's API only.

Production evaluation

Choosing between GPT-6 Luna and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty