text model comparison
GPT-5.4 vs GPT-6 Luna
GPT-5.4 and GPT-6 Luna are both current text models, from OpenAI. GPT-6 Luna is 96% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-5.4, $0.10 vs $2.50. On Arena Text, GPT-5.4 scores 1475 Elo and GPT-6 Luna 1443 Elo (Arena, measured October 8, 2026). Both accept 1,050,000 tokens of context.
- Higher Arena Text
- GPT-5.41475 Elo against 1443 Elo
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- GPT-6 Luna$0.10 against $2.50
- Newer release
- GPT-6 LunaSep 2026 against Mar 2026
Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-28
Side by side
GPT-5.4 and GPT-6 Luna, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | GPT-5.4 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $2.50 | $0.10 (better) |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $15 | $0.50 (better) |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena Text | 1475 Elo (#21 of 49) (better) | 1443 Elo (#37 of 49) |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.3% (#13 of 40) (better) | 90.5% (#25 of 40) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 78.6% (#15 of 40) | 78.9% (#14 of 40) (better) |
| SimpleQA Verified | 45.1% (#24 of 36) (better) | 41.4% (#26 of 36) |
| LiveBench Overall | 77.97 points (#3 of 5) | Not measured |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Release date | March 5, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Access | API only | API only |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input | text, image | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12Epoch AI · 2026-10-12LiveBench · 2026-06-25
Charts
Against every current text model
Where GPT-5.4 and GPT-6 Luna land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
On Arena Text, GPT-5.4 ranks #21 and GPT-6 Luna #37 of 49 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
GPT-5.4:#21of 49
1,475 Elo · ahead of 52%
GPT-6 Luna:#37of 49
1,443 Elo · ahead of 23%
GPQA Diamond
GPT-5.4:#13of 40
93.3% · ahead of 67%
GPT-6 Luna:#25of 40
90.5% · ahead of 36%
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
GPT-5.4:#15of 40
78.6% · ahead of 64%
GPT-6 Luna:#14of 40
78.9% · ahead of 67%
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-5.4:#24of 36
45.1% · ahead of 34%
GPT-6 Luna:#26of 36
41.4% · ahead of 29%
LiveBench Overall
GPT-5.4:#3of 5
78 · ahead of 50%
GPT-6 Luna: Not scored
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
GPT-5.4:#40of 51
$2.50 · cheaper than 22%
GPT-6 Luna:#1of 51
$0.10 · cheaper than 96%
Price per 1M output tokens
GPT-5.4:#40of 51
$15 · cheaper than 20%
GPT-6 Luna:#3of 51
$0.50 · cheaper than 92%
Context window
GPT-5.4:#1of 66
1.05M tokens · longer than 86%
GPT-6 Luna:#1of 66
1.05M tokens · longer than 86%
Quality against price
GPT-5.4 scores 1,475 at $5.63; GPT-6 Luna scores 1,443 at $0.2 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,525 | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,507 |
| Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,501 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,497 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,494 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,490 |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,488 |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | $1.50 | 1,486 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,484 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,483 |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,482 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,482 | |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,478 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,476 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,475 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,475 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,475 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,466 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,466 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,465 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,461 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,456 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,455 | |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,454 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,452 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,451 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $2.06 | 1,429 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,386 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-5.4 costs 28 times as much as GPT-6 Luna, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
GPT-5.4 costs 28× as much
- GPT-5.4
- $55
- GPT-6 Luna
- $2
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
GPT-5.4 costs 29× as much
- GPT-5.4
- $34.75
- GPT-6 Luna
- $1.19
| Workload or rate | GPT-5.4 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $55 | $2 (better) |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $34.75 | $1.19 (better) |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $0.25 | $0.01 (better) |
| 1M input tokens, prompts over 272K tokens | Not listed | $0.20 |
| 1M output tokens, prompts over 272K tokens | Not listed | $0.75 |
Verdict
When to choose each
GPT-5.4
Where it leads
- Higher Arena Text score, 1475 Elo vs 1443 Elo
- Higher GPQA Diamond score, 93.3% vs 90.5%
- Higher SimpleQA Verified score, 45.1% vs 41.4%
Best for
- Long-context coding and professional-work evaluations
Watch out for
- Prompts above the provider long-context threshold use higher token rates; reproduce cost and quality on the target workload
GPT-6 Luna
Where it leads
- Lower input and output prices, $0.10 and $0.50 vs $2.50 and $15 per 1M tokens
- Higher FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) score, 78.9% vs 78.6%
- Cheaper cached input, $0.01 vs $0.25 per 1M tokens
Best for
- High-volume summarisation, extraction and routing
- Long-context budget work, where the 272k threshold is more forgiving than Haiku 5.5's 100k
Watch out for
- Prompts over 272,000 tokens are rebilled at $0.20 input and $0.75 output for the whole request
- A twentieth of GPT-6 Sol's price reflects a capability gap, not a discount on the same model
From benchmark to production
Building on GPT-5.4 or GPT-6 Luna?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
FAQ
GPT-5.4 vs GPT-6 Luna FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is 96% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-5.4, $0.10 vs $2.50. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-5.4 costs $55 and GPT-6 Luna $2 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, GPT-5.4 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-5.4 charges $0.25 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and GPT-6 Luna $0.01, 90% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, GPT-5.4 costs $34.75 and GPT-6 Luna $1.19.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, GPT-5.4 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-5.4 leads on Arena Text, 1475 Elo to 1443 Elo; GPT-5.4 leads on GPQA Diamond, 93.3% to 90.5%; GPT-6 Luna leads on FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2), 78.9% to 78.6%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.4 or GPT-6 Luna?
Both accept 1,050,000 tokens of context. Both return up to 128,000 tokens per response.
Further reading
More on GPT-5.4 and GPT-6 Luna
Articles on GPT-5.4 and GPT-6 Luna
- OpenAI Models on Google Cloud: What Changes for AI TeamsOctober 22, 2026
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna: Cost, Speed and AccuracySeptember 29, 2026
- GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5, Plus Luna: Best Value per TaskSeptember 24, 2026
- GPT-6 Sol and Luna: Half the Price, and Where Each One FitsSeptember 23, 2026
- GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.7: Which Model for Production AI Agents?April 16, 2026
Related comparisons
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.4
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K3
- GPT-4.1 mini vs GPT-6 Luna
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.4
- GPT-4.1 vs GPT-6 Luna
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GPT-5.4
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-5.4
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna
Production evaluation
Choosing between GPT-5.4 and GPT-6 Luna?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty
