text model comparison
GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-5.4
GLM-5.3-Flash and GPT-5.4 are both current text models, from Z.ai and OpenAI. GLM-5.3-Flash is 94% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-5.4, $0.15 vs $2.50. On Arena Text, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 1475 Elo and GPT-5.4 1475 Elo (Arena, measured October 8, 2026). GPT-5.4 has the larger context window, 1,050,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens.
Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13
Side by side
Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | GLM-5.3-Flash | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per 1M input tokens | $0.15 (better) | $2.50 |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $0.50 (better) | $15 |
| Cost of 10M input and 2M output tokens | $2.50 (better) | $55 |
| Arena Text | 1475 Elo (#21 of 49) | 1475 Elo (#21 of 49) |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% (#27 of 40) | 93.3% (#13 of 40) (better) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 55.8% (#31 of 40) | 78.6% (#15 of 40) (better) |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 45.1% (#24 of 36) |
| LiveBench Overall | Not measured | 77.97 points (#3 of 5) |
| Provider | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Release date | August 26, 2026 | March 5, 2026 |
| Access | API and open weights | API only |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input | text, image, video | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
Scores:Arena · 2026-10-12Epoch AI · 2026-10-12LiveBench · 2026-06-25
When to choose each
GLM-5.3-Flash
Best for
- Low-cost coding from screenshots or screen recordings
- Document and research agents on a budget
Watch out for
- Thinking cannot be disabled
- A faster GLM-5.3-FlashX is a separate model id at $0.37 input and $1.25 output per 1M tokens
GPT-5.4
Best for
- Long-context coding and professional-work evaluations
Watch out for
- Prompts above the provider long-context threshold use higher token rates; reproduce cost and quality on the target workload
GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-5.4 FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-5.4?
GLM-5.3-Flash is 94% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-5.4, $0.15 vs $2.50. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GLM-5.3-Flash costs $2.50 and GPT-5.4 $55 at standard rates.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-5.4?
Both score 1475 Elo on Arena Text; GPT-5.4 leads on GPQA Diamond, 93.3% to 90.2%; GPT-5.4 leads on FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2), 78.6% to 55.8%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-5.4?
GPT-5.4 has the larger context window, 1,050,000 vs 1,000,000 tokens.
Can I run GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-5.4 myself?
GLM-5.3-Flash is released as open weights you can run yourself; GPT-5.4 is available through its provider's API only.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.4
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.4
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Production evaluation
Choosing between GLM-5.3-Flash and GPT-5.4?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty