text model comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5.2
Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.2 are both current text models, from Anthropic. Claude Mythos 5.2 is 20% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Claude Fable 5, $8 vs $10. Both accept 1,000,000 tokens of context.
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- Claude Mythos 5.2$8 against $10
- Newer release
- Claude Mythos 5.2Nov 2026 against Jun 2026
Data verified November 10, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-10
Side by side
Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.2, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Mythos 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $10 | $8 (better) |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $50 | $40 (better) |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena Text | 1504 Elo (#5 of 53) | Not measured |
| Arena WebDev | 1625 Elo (#20 of 48) | Not measured |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% (#37 of 43) | Not measured |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 87% (#10 of 43) | Not measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.7% (#8 of 40) | Not measured |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Release date | June 9, 2026 | November 9, 2026 |
| Access | API only | limited access |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input | text, image | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
No independent benchmark has scored both models yet. Each rank counts the current models scored on that benchmark.
Charts
Against every current text model
Where Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.2 land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
Only Claude Fable 5 has a current Arena Text score: #5 of 53. Each bar is the share of current models it beats.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
Claude Fable 5:#5of 53
1,504 Elo · ahead of 92%
Claude Mythos 5.2: Not scored
Arena WebDev
Claude Fable 5:#20of 48
1,625 Elo · ahead of 60%
Claude Mythos 5.2: Not scored
GPQA Diamond
Claude Fable 5:#37of 43
85.9% · ahead of 14%
Claude Mythos 5.2: Not scored
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
Claude Fable 5:#10of 43
87% · ahead of 79%
Claude Mythos 5.2: Not scored
SimpleQA Verified
Claude Fable 5:#8of 40
70.7% · ahead of 82%
Claude Mythos 5.2: Not scored
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
Claude Fable 5:#55of 61
$10 · cheaper than 5%
Claude Mythos 5.2:#53of 61
$8 · cheaper than 12%
Price per 1M output tokens
Claude Fable 5:#55of 61
$50 · cheaper than 5%
Claude Mythos 5.2:#53of 61
$40 · cheaper than 12%
Context window
Claude Fable 5:#28of 70
1M tokens · longer than 23%
Claude Mythos 5.2:#28of 70
1M tokens · longer than 23%
Quality against price
Claude Fable 5 scores 1,504 at $20 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Carbon | $4 | 1,526 | |
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,522 | |
| Muse Wonder | Meta | $8 | 1,511 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,506 |
| Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,503 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,497 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,496 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,490 |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,487 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,484 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,483 | |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,483 |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,482 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,482 |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,475 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,474 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,474 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,468 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,466 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,464 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,461 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,457 |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,456 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,455 | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,453 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,448 |
| Step 5 Preview | StepFun | $1.43 | 1,448 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,442 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,441 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $1.05 | 1,423 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Anthropic | $0.20 | 1,422 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Inkling 2 Small | Thinking Machines Lab | $0.47 | 1,412 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,387 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Claude Fable 5 costs 1.3 times as much as Claude Mythos 5.2, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
Claude Fable 5 costs 1.3× as much
- Claude Fable 5
- $200
- Claude Mythos 5.2
- $160
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
Claude Fable 5 costs 1.3× as much
- Claude Fable 5
- $119
- Claude Mythos 5.2
- $89.80
| Workload or rate | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Mythos 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $200 | $160 (better) |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $119 | $89.80 (better) |
| The same, through the batch API | Not listed | $80 |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $1 | $0.20 (better) |
| 1M input tokens, 5-minute cache write | Not listed | $10 |
| 1M input tokens, 1-hour cache write | Not listed | $16 |
| 1M input tokens, batch | Not listed | $4 |
| 1M output tokens, batch | Not listed | $20 |
Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.
Launch price $100, regular price $150
Verdict
When to choose each
Claude Fable 5
Where it leads
No measured lead over Claude Mythos 5.2 in this data.
Best for
- Long-horizon coding, reasoning, and knowledge-work evaluations
Watch out for
- Fable requires 30-day data retention, and classifier-triggered requests fall back to Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Mythos 5.2
Where it leads
- Lower input and output prices, $8 and $40 vs $10 and $50 per 1M tokens
- Cheaper cached input, $0.20 vs $1 per 1M tokens
- Batch pricing, $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens
Best for
- Vetted security teams finding, reproducing and fixing vulnerabilities
- Dual-use research in security or biology that Claude Fable 5.2's safeguards block
Watch out for
- Limited access: only organisations verified through Anthropic's programs, such as the Cyber Verification Program, can call it
- No independent benchmark has scored it; every number for it comes from Anthropic
From benchmark to production
Building on Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.2?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes
FAQ
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5.2 FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.2?
Claude Mythos 5.2 is 20% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Claude Fable 5, $8 vs $10. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Claude Fable 5 costs $200 and Claude Mythos 5.2 $160 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.2?
Claude Fable 5 charges $1 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and Claude Mythos 5.2 $0.20, 98% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, Claude Fable 5 costs $119 and Claude Mythos 5.2 $89.80.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.2?
Both accept 1,000,000 tokens of context. Both return up to 128,000 tokens per response.
Further reading
More on Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.2
Articles on Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.2
- Claude Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and Mythos 5.2November 10, 2026
- Claude Fable 5 Is Back After 3 Weeks Ban: A Production Team GuideOctober 31, 2026
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT 5.6: Benchmarks, Cost, Access, and Best Use CasesJuly 3, 2026
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash ThinkingJune 11, 2026
- Claude Fable 5: A Practical Guide for Production AI WorkflowsJune 11, 2026
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.2
- Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Mythos 5.2
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Mythos 5.2
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
- Claude Mythos 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Cyber
Production evaluation
Choosing between Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5.2?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty
