text model comparison
Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.6 Terra are both current text models, from Google and OpenAI. Both cost $2 per 1M input tokens. On Arena Text, Gemini 4 Carbon scores 1528 Elo and GPT-5.6 Terra 1467 Elo (Arena, measured October 28, 2026).
- Higher Arena Text
- Gemini 4 Carbon1528 Elo against 1467 Elo
- Newer release
- Gemini 4 CarbonOct 2026 against Jul 2026
Data verified November 5, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-05
Side by side
Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.6 Terra, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | Gemini 4 Carbon | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $2 | $2 |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $10 (better) | $12 |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena Text | 1528 Elo (#1 of 52) (better) | 1467 Elo (#27 of 52) |
| Arena WebDev | 1768 Elo (#4 of 46) | Not measured |
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 93.3% (#14 of 41) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | Not measured | 86% (#10 of 41) |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 43.2% (#26 of 38) |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Release date | October 28, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Access | limited access | API only |
| Context window | Not reported | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Max output | Not reported | 128,000 tokens |
| Input | text, image | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
Charts
Against every current text model
Where Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.6 Terra land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
On Arena Text, Gemini 4 Carbon ranks #1 and GPT-5.6 Terra #27 of 52 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
Gemini 4 Carbon:#1of 52
1,528 Elo · ahead of 100%
GPT-5.6 Terra:#27of 52
1,467 Elo · ahead of 49%
Arena WebDev
Gemini 4 Carbon:#4of 46
1,768 Elo · ahead of 93%
GPT-5.6 Terra: Not scored
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 4 Carbon: Not scored
GPT-5.6 Terra:#14of 41
93.3% · ahead of 65%
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
Gemini 4 Carbon: Not scored
GPT-5.6 Terra:#10of 41
86% · ahead of 75%
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 4 Carbon: Not scored
GPT-5.6 Terra:#26of 38
43.2% · ahead of 32%
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon:#30of 55
$2 · cheaper than 24%
GPT-5.6 Terra:#30of 55
$2 · cheaper than 24%
Price per 1M output tokens
Gemini 4 Carbon:#35of 55
$10 · cheaper than 26%
GPT-5.6 Terra:#42of 55
$12 · cheaper than 24%
Context window
Gemini 4 Carbon: Not listed
GPT-5.6 Terra:#1of 64
1.05M tokens · longer than 86%
Quality against price
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 1,528 at $4; GPT-5.6 Terra scores 1,467 at $4.50 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Carbon | $4 | 1,528 | |
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,520 | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,509 |
| Muse Wonder | Meta | $8 | 1,507 |
| Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,496 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,495 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,492 |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,488 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,483 | |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,482 |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,482 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,482 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,481 |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,477 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,477 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,476 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,476 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,467 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,465 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,465 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,462 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,458 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,456 | |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,455 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,453 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,448 |
| Step 5 Preview | StepFun | $1.43 | 1,448 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,441 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,441 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $1.05 | 1,432 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Anthropic | $0.20 | 1,425 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,388 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Terra costs 1.1 times as much as Gemini 4 Carbon, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra costs 1.1× as much
- Gemini 4 Carbon
- $40
- GPT-5.6 Terra
- $44
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
GPT-5.6 Terra costs 1.2× as much
- Gemini 4 Carbon
- $22.90
- GPT-5.6 Terra
- $27.80
| Workload or rate | Gemini 4 Carbon | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $40 (better) | $44 |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $22.90 (better) | $27.80 |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $0.10 (better) | $0.20 |
Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.
Launch price $100, regular price $150
Verdict
When to choose each
Gemini 4 Carbon
Where it leads
- Lower price per 1M output tokens, $10 vs $12
- Higher Arena Text score, 1528 Elo vs 1467 Elo
- Cheaper cached input, $0.10 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens
Best for
- Finding, validating and patching vulnerabilities, for teams in Google's Fairwind Program
- Long-horizon engineering over very long inputs, once access opens
Watch out for
- Limited access: Google gives it first to a small group of cyber defenders, then to more trusted partners through its Fairwind Program, which governments, healthcare providers and telecoms apply to; there is no public API or app access yet
- The $2 and $10 rates are introductory, with cached input 95% off; after an introductory period Google has not dated, $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens apply
- In Google's own table it trails GPT-6 Astra on FrontierSWE 2 (61.2% against 65.5%) and Claude Opus 5.5 on OSWorld-2.1 (81.5% against 87.2%)
- Google publishes no context window or output limit for Carbon yet
GPT-5.6 Terra
Where it leads
No measured lead over Gemini 4 Carbon in this data.
Best for
- Balanced long-context API evaluations
- Reasoning-heavy work that does not depend on broad factual recall
Watch out for
- Not in the pinned LiveBench snapshot; its independent scores here come from Epoch AI's own GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath and SimpleQA Verified runs
From benchmark to production
Building on Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes
FAQ
Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-5.6 Terra FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Both cost $2 per 1M input tokens. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Gemini 4 Carbon costs $40 and GPT-5.6 Terra $44 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Gemini 4 Carbon charges $0.10 per 1M cached input tokens, 95% below its standard input rate, and GPT-5.6 Terra $0.20, 90% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, Gemini 4 Carbon costs $22.90 and GPT-5.6 Terra $27.80.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Gemini 4 Carbon leads on Arena Text, 1528 Elo to 1467 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Further reading
More on Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.6 Terra
Articles on Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.6 Terra
- Gemini 4 Carbon: Benchmarks, Price and Who Gets It FirstOctober 29, 2026
- Gemini 4 Pro Leaks: What's Verified and What's HypeOctober 1, 2026
- GPT-5.6 on Azure Databricks: Production Guide for AI TeamsJuly 11, 2026
- GPT-5.6 In Microsoft 365 Copilot: What Production Teams Should KnowJuly 10, 2026
- Unverified GPT-5.6 soft launch reports and what they mean for AI-assisted software engineering: what is confirmed?June 21, 2026
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.6 Terra
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Terra
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-5.6 Terra vs Kimi K3
Production evaluation
Choosing between Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-5.6 Terra?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty
