text model comparison
GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro are both current text models, from OpenAI and Moonshot Kimi. Kimi K3.1 Pro is 80% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-6 Astra, $2 vs $10. On Arena WebDev, GPT-6 Astra scores 1773 Elo and Kimi K3.1 Pro 1695 Elo (Arena, measured October 28, 2026). Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,050,000 and 1,048,576).
- Higher Arena WebDev
- GPT-6 Astra1773 Elo against 1695 Elo
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- Kimi K3.1 Pro$2 against $10
- Longer context window
- GPT-6 Astra1.05M tokens against 1.05M tokens
- Newer release
- Kimi K3.1 ProOct 2026 against Sep 2026
Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03
Side by side
GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | GPT-6 Astra | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $10 | $2 (better) |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $50 | $10 (better) |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena WebDev | 1773 Elo (#2 of 45) (better) | 1695 Elo (#6 of 45) |
| Arena Text | 1476 Elo (#21 of 51) | Not measured |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 93.7% (#1 of 42) | Not measured |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.8% (#2 of 41) | Not measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 75.6% (#2 of 38) | Not measured |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot Kimi |
| Release date | September 3, 2026 | October 23, 2026 |
| Access | API only | API only |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | Not reported |
| Input | text, image | text, image, video |
| Output | text | text |
Charts
Against every current text model
Where GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
On Arena WebDev, GPT-6 Astra ranks #2 and Kimi K3.1 Pro #6 of 45 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
GPT-6 Astra:#21of 51
1,476 Elo · ahead of 58%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
Arena WebDev
GPT-6 Astra:#2of 45
1,773 Elo · ahead of 98%
Kimi K3.1 Pro:#6of 45
1,695 Elo · ahead of 89%
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
GPT-6 Astra:#1of 42
93.7% · ahead of 98%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
GPQA Diamond
GPT-6 Astra:#2of 41
95.8% · ahead of 98%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
SimpleQA Verified
GPT-6 Astra:#2of 38
75.6% · ahead of 97%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
GPT-6 Astra:#49of 52
$10 · cheaper than 0%
Kimi K3.1 Pro:#29of 52
$2 · cheaper than 24%
Price per 1M output tokens
GPT-6 Astra:#49of 52
$50 · cheaper than 0%
Kimi K3.1 Pro:#34of 52
$10 · cheaper than 25%
Context window
GPT-6 Astra:#1of 64
1.05M tokens · longer than 86%
Kimi K3.1 Pro:#11of 64
1.05M tokens · longer than 67%
Quality against price
GPT-6 Astra scores 1,476 at $20 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,520 | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,509 |
| Muse Wonder | Meta | $8 | 1,507 |
| Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,496 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,495 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,492 |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,488 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,483 | |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,482 |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,482 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,482 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,481 |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,477 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,477 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,476 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,476 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,467 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,465 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,465 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,462 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,458 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,456 | |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,455 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,453 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,448 |
| Step 5 Preview | StepFun | $1.43 | 1,448 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,441 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,441 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $1.05 | 1,432 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Anthropic | $0.20 | 1,425 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,388 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Astra costs 5.0 times as much as Kimi K3.1 Pro, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
GPT-6 Astra costs 5.0× as much
- GPT-6 Astra
- $200
- Kimi K3.1 Pro
- $40
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
GPT-6 Astra costs 5.0× as much
- GPT-6 Astra
- $119
- Kimi K3.1 Pro
- $23.80
| Workload or rate | GPT-6 Astra | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $200 | $40 (better) |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $119 | $23.80 (better) |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $1 | $0.20 (better) |
| 1M input tokens, 5-minute cache write | Not listed | $2 |
| 1M input tokens, 1-hour cache write | Not listed | $4 |
| 1M input tokens, Highspeed endpoint | Not listed | $4 |
| 1M output tokens, Highspeed endpoint | Not listed | $20 |
Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.
Launch price $100, regular price $150
Verdict
When to choose each
GPT-6 Astra
Where it leads
- Higher Arena WebDev score, 1773 Elo vs 1695 Elo
Best for
- Frontier reasoning and agentic evaluations where deep-context retrieval accuracy is the binding constraint
- Workloads that can be kept under the long-context threshold, where the effective rate stays at $10 / $50
Watch out for
- Long-context billing is a cliff, not a taper: a request over the long-context threshold is rebilled in full at $20 per million input and $75 per million output, so a prompt that crosses it costs roughly double
- GPT-6 Astra is the first publicly released model OpenAI classifies as crossing the Critical cybersecurity threshold under its own Preparedness Framework, which carries additional deployment safeguards
- Vendor-reported benchmark figures come from OpenAI’s own launch material and its own harness; they are not independently reproduced here
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Where it leads
- Lower input and output prices, $2 and $10 vs $10 and $50 per 1M tokens
- Accepts video input
- Cheaper cached input, $0.20 vs $1 per 1M tokens
Best for
- Long-horizon coding and agent work at mid-tier prices
- Long documents, images and video in one 1M-token context
Watch out for
- Thinking is always on: reasoning effort runs low, high or max, and max is the default
- The Highspeed endpoint, two to three times faster by Moonshot's account, costs twice as much at $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens
- Weights are promised by 4 November 2026 and were not out on 3 November; Epoch AI and Arena Text have not scored it yet
From benchmark to production
Building on GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes
FAQ
GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro is 80% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-6 Astra, $2 vs $10. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Astra costs $200 and Kimi K3.1 Pro $40 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
GPT-6 Astra charges $1 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and Kimi K3.1 Pro $0.20, 90% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Astra costs $119 and Kimi K3.1 Pro $23.80.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
GPT-6 Astra leads on Arena WebDev, 1773 Elo to 1695 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,050,000 and 1,048,576).
How do GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro differ in features?
GPT-6 Astra takes text and image input; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes text, image and video.
Further reading
More on GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro
Articles on GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GPT-Rosalind-6: OpenAI's Biology Model and Trusted AccessNovember 1, 2026
- Kimi K3.1 Pro: Benchmarks, Price and Should You Switch?October 25, 2026
- OpenAI Models on Google Cloud: What Changes for AI TeamsOctober 22, 2026
- Gemini 4 Argon Benchmarks: What Independent Tests ShowOctober 1, 2026
- Gemini 4 Pro Leaks: What's Verified and What's HypeOctober 1, 2026
- GDPval-AA Chart Fact-Check: Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra on CostSeptember 24, 2026
Related comparisons
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Luna
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Production evaluation
Choosing between GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty
