Skip to main content

text model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro are both current text models, from OpenAI and Moonshot Kimi. Kimi K3.1 Pro is 80% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-6 Astra, $2 vs $10. On Arena WebDev, GPT-6 Astra scores 1773 Elo and Kimi K3.1 Pro 1695 Elo (Arena, measured October 28, 2026). Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,050,000 and 1,048,576).

Higher Arena WebDev
GPT-6 Astra1773 Elo against 1695 Elo
Lower price per 1M input tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro$2 against $10
Longer context window
GPT-6 Astra1.05M tokens against 1.05M tokens
Newer release
Kimi K3.1 ProOct 2026 against Sep 2026

Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03

Share this

Side by side

GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGPT-6 AstraKimi K3.1 Pro
Price
Price per 1M input tokens$10$2 (better)
Price per 1M output tokens$50$10 (better)
Independent benchmarks
Arena WebDev1773 Elo (#2 of 45) (better)1695 Elo (#6 of 45)
Arena Text1476 Elo (#21 of 51)Not measured
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)93.7% (#1 of 42)Not measured
GPQA Diamond95.8% (#2 of 41)Not measured
SimpleQA Verified75.6% (#2 of 38)Not measured
Specs
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot Kimi
Release dateSeptember 3, 2026October 23, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI only
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000 tokensNot reported
Inputtext, imagetext, image, video
Outputtexttext

Scores:Arena · 2026-11-03Epoch AI · 2026-11-03

Open both in the interactive comparison

Charts

Against every current text model

Where GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

On Arena WebDev, GPT-6 Astra ranks #2 and Kimi K3.1 Pro #6 of 45 current models. Each bar is the share of current models it beats: on score, price and context.

GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Text

GPT-6 Astra:#21of 51

1,476 Elo · ahead of 58%

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored

Arena WebDev

GPT-6 Astra:#2of 45

1,773 Elo · ahead of 98%

Kimi K3.1 Pro:#6of 45

1,695 Elo · ahead of 89%

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)

GPT-6 Astra:#1of 42

93.7% · ahead of 98%

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored

GPQA Diamond

GPT-6 Astra:#2of 41

95.8% · ahead of 98%

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored

SimpleQA Verified

GPT-6 Astra:#2of 38

75.6% · ahead of 97%

Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored

Price and context

Price per 1M input tokens

GPT-6 Astra:#49of 52

$10 · cheaper than 0%

Kimi K3.1 Pro:#29of 52

$2 · cheaper than 24%

Price per 1M output tokens

GPT-6 Astra:#49of 52

$50 · cheaper than 0%

Kimi K3.1 Pro:#34of 52

$10 · cheaper than 25%

Context window

GPT-6 Astra:#1of 64

1.05M tokens · longer than 86%

Kimi K3.1 Pro:#11of 64

1.05M tokens · longer than 67%

Quality against price

Arena Text · measured October 28, 2026

GPT-6 Astra scores 1,476 at $20 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Text score against price for 43 text models, GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro marked.1,2501,3001,3501,4001,4501,5001,550$0.30$1$3$10MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $3Median 1,475Blended price per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scaleArena Text (Elo)GPT-6 Astra
Quality against price: the data
Arena Text score against price for 43 text models, GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro marked.
ModelProviderBlended price per 1M tokensArena Text (Elo)
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle$41,520
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$81,509
Muse WonderMeta$81,507
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$201,504
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic$201,504
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$1.501,496
Muse Spark 1.3Meta$21,495
Claude Opus 5Anthropic$101,492
Kimi K3Moonshot Kimi$61,488
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$81,485
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle$31,483
GPT-5.5OpenAI$111,482
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic$101,482
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Qwen$31,482
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI$41,481
GLM-5.3Z.ai$2.151,481
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi MiMo$0.541,480
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$41,477
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai$0.241,477
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI$201,476
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek$0.521,476
GPT-5.4OpenAI$5.631,475
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle$1.131,473
Grok 4.20xAI$1.561,472
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.501,467
Grok 4.5xAI$31,465
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$1.981,465
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$41,462
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$41,458
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.851,456
Grok 4.6xAI$31,455
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.451,453
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi MiMo$0.181,448
Step 5 PreviewStepFun$1.431,448
Grok 4.3xAI$1.561,442
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.201,441
Grok 4.7xAI$31,441
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI$1.051,432
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic$0.201,425
GPT-4.1OpenAI$3.501,415
Solar Pro 4Upstage$0.521,388
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI$0.701,383
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI$0.181,322

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

The same work, priced

For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Astra costs 5.0 times as much as Kimi K3.1 Pro, at each provider's listed rates.

What GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro cost for the same work, at the rates each provider lists.
  • 10M input and 2M output tokens

    GPT-6 Astra costs 5.0× as much

    GPT-6 Astra
    $200
    Kimi K3.1 Pro
    $40
  • The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached

    GPT-6 Astra costs 5.0× as much

    GPT-6 Astra
    $119
    Kimi K3.1 Pro
    $23.80
Workload or rateGPT-6 AstraKimi K3.1 Pro
Example workloads
10M input and 2M output tokens$200$40 (better)
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached$119$23.80 (better)
Other listed rates
1M input tokens, cached$1$0.20 (better)
1M input tokens, 5-minute cache writeNot listed$2
1M input tokens, 1-hour cache writeNot listed$4
1M input tokens, Highspeed endpointNot listed$4
1M output tokens, Highspeed endpointNot listed$20

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

GPT-6 Astra

Where it leads

  • Higher Arena WebDev score, 1773 Elo vs 1695 Elo

Best for

  • Frontier reasoning and agentic evaluations where deep-context retrieval accuracy is the binding constraint
  • Workloads that can be kept under the long-context threshold, where the effective rate stays at $10 / $50

Watch out for

  • Long-context billing is a cliff, not a taper: a request over the long-context threshold is rebilled in full at $20 per million input and $75 per million output, so a prompt that crosses it costs roughly double
  • GPT-6 Astra is the first publicly released model OpenAI classifies as crossing the Critical cybersecurity threshold under its own Preparedness Framework, which carries additional deployment safeguards
  • Vendor-reported benchmark figures come from OpenAI’s own launch material and its own harness; they are not independently reproduced here

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Where it leads

  • Lower input and output prices, $2 and $10 vs $10 and $50 per 1M tokens
  • Accepts video input
  • Cheaper cached input, $0.20 vs $1 per 1M tokens

Best for

  • Long-horizon coding and agent work at mid-tier prices
  • Long documents, images and video in one 1M-token context

Watch out for

  • Thinking is always on: reasoning effort runs low, high or max, and max is the default
  • The Highspeed endpoint, two to three times faster by Moonshot's account, costs twice as much at $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens
  • Weights are promised by 4 November 2026 and were not out on 3 November; Epoch AI and Arena Text have not scored it yet

From benchmark to production

Building on GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

FAQ

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro is 80% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GPT-6 Astra, $2 vs $10. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Astra costs $200 and Kimi K3.1 Pro $40 at standard rates.

Which is cheaper with prompt caching, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

GPT-6 Astra charges $1 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and Kimi K3.1 Pro $0.20, 90% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, GPT-6 Astra costs $119 and Kimi K3.1 Pro $23.80.

Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

GPT-6 Astra leads on Arena WebDev, 1773 Elo to 1695 Elo. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Astra or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,050,000 and 1,048,576).

How do GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro differ in features?

GPT-6 Astra takes text and image input; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes text, image and video.

Production evaluation

Choosing between GPT-6 Astra and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty