Skip to main content

text model comparison

Glimpse vs Mistral Large 4

Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 are both current text models, from Elorian and Mistral AI. Glimpse is 14% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Mistral Large 4, $0.60 vs $0.70.

Lower price per 1M input tokens
Glimpse$0.60 against $0.70
Newer release
GlimpseOct 2026 against Oct 2026

Data verified November 3, 2026 · Dataset 2026-11-03

Share this

Side by side

Glimpse and Mistral Large 4, line by line

Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.

FactGlimpseMistral Large 4
Price
Price per 1M input tokens$0.60 (better)$0.70
Price per 1M output tokens$3$2.10 (better)
Independent benchmarks
Arena TextNot measured1432 Elo (#40 of 51)
Arena WebDevNot measured1544 Elo (#32 of 45)
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)Not measured46.3% (#36 of 42)
GPQA DiamondNot measured90.2% (#28 of 41)
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured22.4% (#36 of 38)
Specs
ProviderElorianMistral AI
Release dateOctober 16, 2026October 6, 2026
AccessAPI onlyAPI and open weights
Context windowNot reported1,000,000 tokens
Max outputNot reportedNot reported
Inputtext, image, videotext, image
Outputtexttext

No independent benchmark has scored both models yet. Each rank counts the current models scored on that benchmark.

Scores:Arena · 2026-11-03Epoch AI · 2026-11-03

Charts

Against every current text model

Where Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.

Where each stands

Only Mistral Large 4 has a current Arena Text score: #40 of 51. Each bar is the share of current models it beats.

Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 among the current text models, one row per benchmark, price and context window.

Independent benchmarks

Arena Text

Glimpse: Not scored

Mistral Large 4:#40of 51

1,432 Elo · ahead of 22%

Arena WebDev

Glimpse: Not scored

Mistral Large 4:#32of 45

1,544 Elo · ahead of 30%

FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)

Glimpse: Not scored

Mistral Large 4:#36of 42

46.3% · ahead of 15%

GPQA Diamond

Glimpse: Not scored

Mistral Large 4:#28of 41

90.2% · ahead of 30%

SimpleQA Verified

Glimpse: Not scored

Mistral Large 4:#36of 38

22.4% · ahead of 5%

Price and context

Price per 1M input tokens

Glimpse:#18of 52

$0.60 · cheaper than 67%

Mistral Large 4:#19of 52

$0.70 · cheaper than 65%

Price per 1M output tokens

Glimpse:#21of 52

$3 · cheaper than 59%

Mistral Large 4:#16of 52

$2.10 · cheaper than 71%

Context window

Glimpse: Not listed

Mistral Large 4:#26of 64

1M tokens · longer than 22%

Quality against price

Arena Text · measured October 28, 2026

Mistral Large 4 scores 1,432 at $1.05 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.

Quality against priceArena Text score against price for 43 text models, Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 marked.1,2501,3001,3501,4001,4501,5001,550$0.30$1$3$10MOST ATTRACTIVE QUADRANTMedian price $3Median 1,475Blended price per 1M tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scaleArena Text (Elo)Mistral Large 4
Quality against price: the data
Arena Text score against price for 43 text models, Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 marked.
ModelProviderBlended price per 1M tokensArena Text (Elo)
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle$41,520
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic$81,509
Muse WonderMeta$81,507
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$201,504
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic$201,504
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle$1.501,496
Muse Spark 1.3Meta$21,495
Claude Opus 5Anthropic$101,492
Kimi K3Moonshot Kimi$61,488
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI$81,485
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle$31,483
GPT-5.5OpenAI$111,482
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic$101,482
Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Qwen$31,482
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI$41,481
GLM-5.3Z.ai$2.151,481
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi MiMo$0.541,480
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic$41,477
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai$0.241,477
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI$201,476
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek$0.521,476
GPT-5.4OpenAI$5.631,475
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle$1.131,473
Grok 4.20xAI$1.561,472
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$4.501,467
Grok 4.5xAI$31,465
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek$1.981,465
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic$41,462
GPT-6 SolOpenAI$41,458
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.851,456
Grok 4.6xAI$31,455
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.451,453
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi MiMo$0.181,448
Step 5 PreviewStepFun$1.431,448
Grok 4.3xAI$1.561,442
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI$0.201,441
Grok 4.7xAI$31,441
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI$1.051,432
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic$0.201,425
GPT-4.1OpenAI$3.501,415
Solar Pro 4Upstage$0.521,388
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI$0.701,383
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI$0.181,322

Cost

What each costs

Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.

The same work, priced

For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Glimpse costs 1.1 times as much as Mistral Large 4, at each provider's listed rates.

What Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 cost for the same work, at the rates each provider lists.
  • 10M input and 2M output tokens

    Glimpse costs 1.1× as much

    Glimpse
    $12
    Mistral Large 4
    $11.20
Workload or rateGlimpseMistral Large 4
Example workloads
10M input and 2M output tokens$12$11.20 (better)
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cachedNot listed$5.53
Other listed rates
1M input tokens, cachedNot listed$0.07

Your own bill will differ. These figures use list prices and example workloads. The AI Model Cost Audit reviews your real usage, shortlists models that score as well for each task for less, and estimates the savings.

Launch price $100, regular price $150

Book the cost audit

Verdict

When to choose each

Glimpse

Where it leads

  • Lower price per 1M input tokens, $0.60 vs $0.70
  • Accepts video input

Best for

  • Visual question answering over charts, scenes and short videos
  • Counting and captioning at a lower price than frontier multimodal models

Watch out for

  • In Elorian's own table GPT-6 Astra scores higher on six of the twelve evaluations, including TOMATO temporal reasoning and Video-MME v2
  • Post-trained on an open-weights base model Elorian does not name; it publishes no context window or output limit, and no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet

Mistral Large 4

Where it leads

  • Lower price per 1M output tokens, $2.10 vs $3
  • Lower cost for 10M input and 2M output tokens, $11.20 vs $12
  • Open weights you can run yourself
  • A cached-input rate, $0.07 per 1M tokens

Best for

  • Self-hosted or European data-residency deployments that want a frontier-scale multimodal model
  • Coding and security agents where open weights and a low API price both matter

Watch out for

  • The API model is still labelled a public preview, and the open weights are a further-trained build of the October 6 preview
  • Businesses that sell it as a hosted model service need a separate commercial licence from Mistral
  • Running the open weights moves cost to your own GPUs, which the token rates here do not represent
  • Epoch AI measured 22.4% on SimpleQA Verified for the open-weight build, low for its size, so check factual recall on your own questions

From benchmark to production

Building on Glimpse or Mistral Large 4?

Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.

AI Model Cost AuditLaunch price $100, regular price $150What the audit includes

FAQ

Glimpse vs Mistral Large 4 FAQ

Which is cheaper, Glimpse or Mistral Large 4?

Glimpse is 14% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Mistral Large 4, $0.60 vs $0.70. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Glimpse costs $12 and Mistral Large 4 $11.20 at standard rates.

Do Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 discount cached input?

Mistral Large 4 lists a cached-input rate of $0.07 per 1M tokens, 90% below its standard input rate. No cached-input rate is listed for Glimpse.

How do Glimpse and Mistral Large 4 differ in features?

Glimpse takes text, image and video input; Mistral Large 4 takes text and image.

Can I run Glimpse or Mistral Large 4 myself?

Mistral Large 4 is released as open weights you can run yourself; Glimpse is available through its provider's API only.

Production evaluation

Choosing between Glimpse and Mistral Large 4?

Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.

  • A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
  • Routing between models by cost and difficulty