text model comparison
GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-4.1 nano
GLM-5.3-Flash and GPT-4.1 nano are both current text models, from Z.ai and OpenAI. GPT-4.1 nano is 33% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GLM-5.3-Flash, $0.10 vs $0.15. On Arena Text, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 1475 Elo and GPT-4.1 nano 1322 Elo (Arena, measured October 8, 2026). Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,047,576 and 1,000,000).
Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13
Side by side
Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | GLM-5.3-Flash | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price per 1M input tokens | $0.15 | $0.10 (better) |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $0.50 | $0.40 (better) |
| Cost of 10M input and 2M output tokens | $2.50 | $1.80 (better) |
| Arena Text | 1475 Elo (#21 of 49) (better) | 1322 Elo (#49 of 49) |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% (#27 of 40) (better) | 48.9% (#40 of 40) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 55.8% (#31 of 40) | Not measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 6% (#36 of 36) |
| Provider | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Release date | August 26, 2026 | April 14, 2025 |
| Access | API and open weights | API only |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,047,576 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Input | text, image, video | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
When to choose each
GLM-5.3-Flash
Best for
- Low-cost coding from screenshots or screen recordings
- Document and research agents on a budget
Watch out for
- Thinking cannot be disabled
- A faster GLM-5.3-FlashX is a separate model id at $0.37 input and $1.25 output per 1M tokens
GPT-4.1 nano
Best for
- High-volume API screening at low published token prices
Watch out for
- Not in the pinned LiveBench snapshot; its independent scores here come from Epoch AI's own GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath and SimpleQA Verified runs
GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-4.1 nano FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-4.1 nano?
GPT-4.1 nano is 33% cheaper per 1M input tokens than GLM-5.3-Flash, $0.10 vs $0.15. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GLM-5.3-Flash costs $2.50 and GPT-4.1 nano $1.80 at standard rates.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-4.1 nano?
GLM-5.3-Flash leads on Arena Text, 1475 Elo to 1322 Elo; GLM-5.3-Flash leads on GPQA Diamond, 90.2% to 48.9%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-4.1 nano?
Both accept about 1.05M tokens of context (1,047,576 and 1,000,000).
Can I run GLM-5.3-Flash or GPT-4.1 nano myself?
GLM-5.3-Flash is released as open weights you can run yourself; GPT-4.1 nano is available through its provider's API only.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-4.1 nano
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-5.4
Production evaluation
Choosing between GLM-5.3-Flash and GPT-4.1 nano?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty