text model comparison
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4.5
GLM-5.3-Flash and Grok 4.5 are both current text models, from Z.ai and xAI. GLM-5.3-Flash is 93% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Grok 4.5, $0.15 vs $2. On Arena Text, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 1475 Elo and Grok 4.5 1466 Elo (Arena, measured October 8, 2026). GLM-5.3-Flash has the larger context window, 1,000,000 vs 500,000 tokens.
Data verified October 13, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-13
Side by side
Standard-tier prices in effect today. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per 1M input tokens | $0.15 (better) | $2 |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $0.50 (better) | $6 |
| Cost of 10M input and 2M output tokens | $2.50 (better) | $32 |
| Arena Text | 1475 Elo (#21 of 49) (better) | 1466 Elo (#27 of 49) |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% (#27 of 40) | 93.4% (#12 of 40) (better) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 55.8% (#31 of 40) | 57.2% (#30 of 40) (better) |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 48.3% (#21 of 36) |
| Provider | Z.ai | xAI |
| Release date | August 26, 2026 | July 16, 2026 |
| Access | API and open weights | API only |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 500,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | Not reported |
| Input | text, image, video | text, image |
| Output | text | text |
When to choose each
GLM-5.3-Flash
Best for
- Low-cost coding from screenshots or screen recordings
- Document and research agents on a budget
Watch out for
- Thinking cannot be disabled
- A faster GLM-5.3-FlashX is a separate model id at $0.37 input and $1.25 output per 1M tokens
Grok 4.5
Best for
- Coding and agentic API evaluations below the long-context pricing threshold
Watch out for
- The published base rates increase for requests at or above the provider long-context threshold
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4.5 FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.5?
GLM-5.3-Flash is 93% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Grok 4.5, $0.15 vs $2. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, GLM-5.3-Flash costs $2.50 and Grok 4.5 $32 at standard rates.
Which scores higher on independent benchmarks, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.5?
GLM-5.3-Flash leads on Arena Text, 1475 Elo to 1466 Elo; Grok 4.5 leads on GPQA Diamond, 93.4% to 90.2%; Grok 4.5 leads on FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2), 57.2% to 55.8%. Scores are independent evaluations, not either vendor's launch figures.
Which has the larger context window, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.5?
GLM-5.3-Flash has the larger context window, 1,000,000 vs 500,000 tokens.
Can I run GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.5 myself?
GLM-5.3-Flash is released as open weights you can run yourself; Grok 4.5 is available through its provider's API only.
Related comparisons
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.5
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Grok 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Production evaluation
Choosing between GLM-5.3-Flash and Grok 4.5?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty