text model comparison
Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro are both current text models, from Moonshot Kimi. Kimi K3.1 Pro is 33% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Kimi K3, $2 vs $3. Both accept 1,048,576 tokens of context.
- Lower price per 1M input tokens
- Kimi K3.1 Pro$2 against $3
- Newer release
- Kimi K3.1 ProOct 2026 against Jul 2026
Data verified October 28, 2026 · Dataset 2026-10-28
Side by side
Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro, line by line
Prices in effect today, compared at the same tier wherever both list one. The better value in each row is highlighted.
| Fact | Kimi K3 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price per 1M input tokens | $3 | $2 (better) |
| Price per 1M output tokens | $15 | $10 (better) |
| Independent benchmarks | ||
| Arena Text | 1488 Elo (#8 of 49) | Not measured |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.1% (#15 of 40) | Not measured |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) | 72.2% (#19 of 40) | Not measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 50.6% (#19 of 36) | Not measured |
| Specs | ||
| Provider | Moonshot Kimi | Moonshot Kimi |
| Release date | July 16, 2026 | October 23, 2026 |
| Access | API and open weights | API only |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | Not reported | Not reported |
| Input | text, image | text, image, video |
| Output | text | text |
No independent benchmark has scored both models yet. Each rank counts the current models scored on that benchmark.
Charts
Against every current text model
Where Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro land among the current models of their task, on every independent benchmark, on price and on context.
Where each stands
Only Kimi K3 has a current Arena Text score: #8 of 49. Each bar is the share of current models it beats.
Independent benchmarks
Arena Text
Kimi K3:#8of 49
1,488 Elo · ahead of 85%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
GPQA Diamond
Kimi K3:#15of 40
93.1% · ahead of 64%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)
Kimi K3:#19of 40
72.2% · ahead of 54%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
SimpleQA Verified
Kimi K3:#19of 36
50.6% · ahead of 49%
Kimi K3.1 Pro: Not scored
Price and context
Price per 1M input tokens
Kimi K3:#41of 51
$3 · cheaper than 20%
Kimi K3.1 Pro:#28of 51
$2 · cheaper than 24%
Price per 1M output tokens
Kimi K3:#40of 51
$15 · cheaper than 20%
Kimi K3.1 Pro:#33of 51
$10 · cheaper than 26%
Context window
Kimi K3:#11of 66
1.05M tokens · longer than 65%
Kimi K3.1 Pro:#11of 66
1.05M tokens · longer than 65%
Quality against price
Kimi K3 scores 1,488 at $6 (blended price per 1M tokens). The line joins the current models no other beats on both price and Arena Text score; hover any point to name it.
Quality against price: the data
| Model | Provider | Blended price per 1M tokens | Arena Text (Elo) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 4 Argon | $4 | 1,525 | |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | $8 | 1,507 |
| Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,504 |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | $20 | 1,501 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $1.50 | 1,497 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Meta | $2 | 1,494 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,490 |
| Kimi K3 | Moonshot Kimi | $6 | 1,488 |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | $1.50 | 1,486 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenAI | $8 | 1,485 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,484 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Alibaba Qwen | $3 | 1,483 |
| GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $11 | 1,482 |
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | $3 | 1,482 | |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $10 | 1,481 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.54 | 1,480 |
| GLM-5.3 | Z.ai | $2.15 | 1,478 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,476 |
| GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $5.63 | 1,475 |
| GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | $20 | 1,475 |
| DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | DeepSeek | $0.52 | 1,475 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Z.ai | $0.24 | 1,475 |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | $1.13 | 1,473 | |
| Grok 4.20 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,472 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | OpenAI | $4.50 | 1,466 |
| Grok 4.5 | xAI | $3 | 1,466 |
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | DeepSeek | $1.98 | 1,465 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | $4 | 1,461 |
| GPT-6 Sol | OpenAI | $4 | 1,456 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | $0.85 | 1,455 | |
| Grok 4.6 | xAI | $3 | 1,454 |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.45 | 1,452 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Xiaomi MiMo | $0.18 | 1,451 |
| GPT-6 Luna | OpenAI | $0.20 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | $3 | 1,443 |
| Grok 4.3 | xAI | $1.56 | 1,442 |
| Mistral Large 4 | Mistral AI | $2.06 | 1,429 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI | $3.50 | 1,415 |
| Solar Pro 4 | Upstage | $0.52 | 1,386 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $0.70 | 1,383 |
| GPT-4.1 nano | OpenAI | $0.18 | 1,322 |
Cost
What each costs
Example workloads at each provider's listed rates, then every other rate either one lists. The cheaper figure in each row is highlighted.
The same work, priced
For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Kimi K3 costs 1.5 times as much as Kimi K3.1 Pro, at each provider's listed rates.
10M input and 2M output tokens
Kimi K3 costs 1.5× as much
- Kimi K3
- $60
- Kimi K3.1 Pro
- $40
The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached
Kimi K3 costs 1.5× as much
- Kimi K3
- $35.70
- Kimi K3.1 Pro
- $23.80
| Workload or rate | Kimi K3 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Example workloads | ||
| 10M input and 2M output tokens | $60 | $40 (better) |
| The same, with 9M of the input tokens cached | $35.70 | $23.80 (better) |
| Other listed rates | ||
| 1M input tokens, cached | $0.30 | $0.20 (better) |
| 1M input tokens, 5-minute cache write | Not listed | $2 |
| 1M input tokens, 1-hour cache write | Not listed | $4 |
| 1M input tokens, Highspeed endpoint | Not listed | $4 |
| 1M output tokens, Highspeed endpoint | Not listed | $20 |
Verdict
When to choose each
Kimi K3
Where it leads
- Open weights you can run yourself
Best for
- Teams that want a frontier-scale model they can also self-host, with one architecture across both paths
- Long-context work at mid-tier hosted pricing
Watch out for
- Hosted rates match Claude Sonnet 5 exactly at $3 / $15 while offering a larger context window, so the comparison turns on capability rather than price
- Running the open weights shifts cost to infrastructure, which the token rates recorded here do not represent
- Moonshot’s self-reported results place it ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 but behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol; none of this was reproduced independently here
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Where it leads
- Lower input and output prices, $2 and $10 vs $3 and $15 per 1M tokens
- Accepts video input
- Cheaper cached input, $0.20 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens
Best for
- Long-horizon coding and agent work at mid-tier prices
- Long documents, images and video in one 1M-token context
Watch out for
- Thinking is always on: reasoning effort runs low, high or max, and max is the default
- The Highspeed endpoint, two to three times faster by Moonshot's account, costs twice as much at $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens
- Weights are promised by 4 November 2026 and were not out when this record was made; no independent benchmark score is recorded here yet
From benchmark to production
Building on Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Public scores rarely hold on your own data. We test both models on your real tasks, then build the agent or pipeline around the one that wins.
FAQ
Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro is 33% cheaper per 1M input tokens than Kimi K3, $2 vs $3. For 10M input and 2M output tokens, Kimi K3 costs $60 and Kimi K3.1 Pro $40 at standard rates.
Which is cheaper with prompt caching, Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3 charges $0.30 per 1M cached input tokens, 90% below its standard input rate, and Kimi K3.1 Pro $0.20, 90% below. With 9M of 10M input tokens cached and 2M output tokens, Kimi K3 costs $35.70 and Kimi K3.1 Pro $23.80.
Which has the larger context window, Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Both accept 1,048,576 tokens of context.
How do Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro differ in features?
Kimi K3 takes text and image input; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes text, image and video.
Can I run Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro myself?
Kimi K3 is released as open weights you can run yourself; Kimi K3.1 Pro is available through its provider's API only.
Further reading
More on Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
Articles on Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Kimi K3.1 Pro: Benchmarks, Price and Should You Switch?October 25, 2026
- Qwen vs DeepSeek vs Kimi for Agents and CodingAugust 6, 2026
- Kimi K3 vs Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: which model should you use?July 31, 2026
Production evaluation
Choosing between Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Public benchmarks narrow the shortlist. We run both on your own tasks, data and cost limits, then build the routing and review controls to run the winner in production.
- A head-to-head evaluation on your real workload
- Routing between models by cost and difficulty
